Skip to main content

The Gated Enclave and the Mirror We Refuse to Hold

 


The Gated Enclave and the Mirror We Refuse to Hold

In the eastern reaches of Singapore, a particular kind of Indian migrant built a parallel world. Not the whole diaspora. A visible, upwardly mobile slice: the techies, the investment bankers, the professionals who arrived with degrees, capital, and the quiet certainty that caste and class privilege breeds. They settled into gated communities that felt less like Singapore than like fragments of Noida, Bangalore, or Gurgaon lifted whole and set down by the sea. High walls. Controlled access. Familiar festivals. Diwali lights and Holi colours, carefully contained within the perimeter.

From inside those walls, videos leaked out now and then. Anyone who has watched power operate in India recognised what they showed: the studied disdain reserved for working people. Taxi drivers. Hawkers. Security guards. Domestic workers. The precarious Singaporeans whose labour keeps the city fed, guarded, and moving. The tone, the body language, the assumption that hierarchy simply exists and one stands at the top of it. None of this was invented in the new country. These were habits carried across the ocean and performed with the same casual entitlement that treats being served as the natural order of things.

The separation took effort, and the effort was deliberate. Singaporeans outside the gates were kept at a distance. Life inside revolved around private celebrations and private networks. The city beyond supplied infrastructure, safety, and opportunity, and received little in return. And when friction surfaced, when local voices expressed frustration about immigration, about scale, about cultural distance, the enclave answered swiftly and defensively with accusations of racism. The mirror stayed facing outward.

Here honesty becomes necessary. Caste privilege does not dissolve at immigration control. It travels. It reinterprets itself as pure merit, reads structural advantage as personal excellence, and then experiences any local pushback as pure bigotry. What results is a selective blindness. The same people who reproduce hierarchical contempt toward Singapore's working class claim victimhood the moment Singaporeans notice the pattern and name it.

A little humility would change the texture of these encounters. Nobody asks for performative apology or rituals of endless contrition. What the moment demands is plainer: the recognition that arrival confers no right to transplant old hierarchies onto new ground. The people who drive the taxis, staff the hawker centres, and guard the gates are citizens of the place that has absorbed the migrants, with histories and claims of their own, never supporting characters in an Indian success narrative. To treat them with the casual superiority once reserved for the driver or the domestic worker back home, and to call that treatment culture, is to smuggle caste under a new sky.

Migration inserts the migrant into someone else's social fabric. Nobody migrates into empty space. Those who arrive with the greatest structural advantages, with education, networks, mobility, and the settled confidence that the world is arranged for their advancement, carry the greater obligation to examine what they bring with them. The gated community that replicates Gurgaon in the east of Singapore is a choice, and the choice carries a politics: to remain sealed off while demanding the moral high ground whenever the seal is noticed.

Looking in the mirror betrays nothing Indian. The betrayal lies in the fragility that converts every criticism into racism, that spends its energy policing how the enclave is perceived rather than asking what the enclave does. The communities that migrate into Singapore, or anywhere else, will build better relationships when they stop mistaking entitlement for excellence and start treating the working people of their host society with the basic respect that caste and class trained them, over generations, to withhold. The walls can stay. The attitudes do not have to.


Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

The Suit Walks the Corridor

  The Suit Walks the Corridor At ten past nine on a Monday the corridor on the top floor of the administration building fills with the sound of expensive shoes. The carpet up here was laid in the last refurbishment and still gives slightly underfoot, the way a good hotel lobby does, and the doors along it close with the soft, well-engineered thud of a German car. Along this carpet, in the direction of the lift marked Executive, comes the suit. It comes in navy and in charcoal, in the odd daring pinstripe, in the female version too, a tailored jacket over a silk shell, and heels that announce themselves on the tile of the lift lobby a full three seconds before the person arrives. The suit carries a flat white from the good cafe, the one that closed the student cafe to open, and a lanyard that swings with the confidence of a thing that opens doors. The suit passes the framed founding professors, who were photographed in gowns and look, at this distance, like a row of disapproving pe...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more