The Margins Review · Culture-Centered Approach

  "A thousand little chips" at Te Tiriti: Dane Giraud, the far-right outrage machine, and the white supremacist ecosystem he amplifies By Mohan J Dutta Exhibit 1: Tweet by Dane Giraud On 27 October 2025, in response to a tweet from one James Rossiter — an account that declares its Catholicism, declares its allegiance to Nick Fuentes , and declares its intention to "take over New Zealand" while telling me, an Indian-origin academic, to "go home" — I wrote: "Te Tiriti gives us the right to send white supremacists packing to their European backwaters! That is the beauty of Te Tiriti, and the reason why white supremacists target it so hard." Dane Giraud , Council Member of the Free Speech Union (FSU) and host of its Free To Speak podcast , six months later, ripped that sentence out of the thread, screenshotted only my post, and re-broadcast it to his audience with sarcastic flourish: "This must be based on more world-class research by t...

  Four Moves: Reading Joseph Mooney's Reply How a National Party MP's "personal opinion" defence reveals the global far-right playbook now operating in Aotearoa In September 2025, a sitting Member of the New Zealand Parliament publicly told a named professor at a named university that I "should be seeking alternative employment." The MP is Joseph Mooney , National Party representative for Southland. The professor is me — Dean's Chair Professor of Communication at Massey University. The provocation was a tweet in which I described Charlie Kirk as "a white supremacist far right figure," and pointed out that the National-ACT attempt to record a parliamentary tribute to Kirk would itself reveal who in our mainstream politics aligns with the far right. The original post and the documented harassment campaign it triggered — including calls for my deportation, demands that Massey be defunded, and threats that prompted me to call the police — are...

  The Anxious Fig Leaf of the Free Speech Union: How a Right-Wing Pamphleteer Performs the Communicative Inversions of "Academic Standards" By Mohan J. Dutta Dane Giraud — a self-styled Free Speech Union board member who has previously called my employer to demand I be sacked, who publicly admitted as much on the FSU's own blog, and who now parades the resulting Substack post as evidence that my scholarship "cannot be referred to — in anyway — as academic " — has gifted us a near-perfect specimen of what the culture-centered approach (CCA) describes as communicative inversion : the strategic deployment of the language of rigour, freedom, and standards to do the precise opposite work — to erase, to silence, and to police the boundaries of who is permitted to speak as a knower. This response is not a personal squabble. Giraud's piece is a textbook articulation of a transnational pattern in which racialised scholars who name white supremacy , Hindutva , ...