Skip to main content

Internationalizing the discipline? The politics of time zones and meetings


It is great to witness the increasing acknowledgment of diverse geographies on the registers of our disciplinary associations.

The term "global" as a signifier entering into disciplinary conversations offers an anchor for starting to de-center the US-centrism of the discipline. 

It is the beginning of the acknowledgment that Communication Studies has historically been US-centric and in this sense, deeply parochial. 

The Cold War roots of the discipline, underlying the US-centric hegemony, drive the basic assumptions that have shaped our discipline, taking for granted the US centric norms. 

The US is ever-present by its absence as a site/space in disciplinary conversations. 

While the elsewheres of geographies is where globalization happens, the US core and its taken for granted assumptions shape the contours through which globalization is conceptualized and engaged. This functioning around US assumptions unfortunately is also perpetrated by many people of colour, Global South origin scholars who otherwise clamor to lay claim on their Global South connections to perform some form of marginality.

One such site where taken-for-granted assumptions around US-centrism run deep is in the organizing of meetings around time zones. 

As US-based communication associations have sought to expand their global reach, it has meant that there are increasing demands on scholars located elsewhere to support the global efforts.

However, the ways in which meetings are organized often give away the assumptions and power of the US core. 

Most meetings therefore are set up on time zones that suit US scholars, around US working hours, childcare duties, and sleep zones. US-based scholars articulate freely their need for attending to children, going to bed, regular work hour meetings at the University etc.

Scholars of the "elsewhere" by extension are naturally expected to wake up at midnight, stay up until 1 am., wake up at 2 am, or stay chirpy at 4 am. 

The circadian rhythms, sleep cycles, and familial roles of the elsewhere are often simply taken-for-granted, incorporated into the assumption that bodies elsewhere will adapt to the needs of the US-based disciplinary machine to globalize.

Bodies from elsewhere, health and wellbeing in the elsewhere, need for rest in the elsewhere can be sacrificed so the discipline can expand its global reach.

Internationalizing the discipline thus further entrenches the US status quo while perpetuating harm on the discipline's elsewheres.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...
Read more