Skip to main content

The Imperial Rape Machine: Epstein Was Never an Anomaly—He Was the Tradition


None of the Epstein revelations should shock anyone who has studied colonialism with open eyes.


What the world calls a “scandal” is better understood as an unbroken historical through-line: the systematic sexual barbarism that has always been structural to white supremacist empire-building. The depravity on display in Epstein’s mansions, private islands, and private jets is not a modern aberration.

It is the same depravity that saturated the slave quarters, the frontier forts, the colonial barracks, and the plantation big houses. It is older than the United States. It is foundational to it.

White supremacy has never been only about skin color or alleged intellectual hierarchy. At its violent heart, it has always been an ideology of entitled access—the unquestioned right of the “superior” man to take, use, degrade, and discard the bodies of those he has already classified as less-than-human.

When European men first stepped onto this continent, they did not limit conquest to land and gold. They conquered women’s bodies as proof of dominion. Rape was military doctrine: a weapon to shatter Indigenous societies, erase bloodlines, terrorize resistance, and mark territory through violation. The same logic governed the transatlantic slave system. Enslaved African women were not merely laborers; they were breeding stock. Their rape by enslavers was not a crime—it was capital accumulation. 

Forced reproduction after 1808 turned Black wombs into the new Middle Passage. Enslaved men were sexually humiliated and violated to crush dignity and remind every Black person of total ownership. White men’s sexual impunity was the daily performance of supremacy.

This was never hidden. It was boasted about in diaries, court records, travelogues, and plantation ledgers. The ability to rape without consequence was not a bug in the colonial-imperial machine; it was a feature. Sexual depravity became the visceral language of power: “I can do this to you because you are nothing.”

Jeffrey Epstein did not invent anything new. He simply replicated—in 21st-century luxury—what enslavers, conquistadors, colonial governors, and imperial officers had done for centuries: he turned access to vulnerable, racialized, and economically disposable female bodies into a currency of elite male bonding. The guest lists, the flights, the “massages,” the blackmail material—the entire operation mirrored the way powerful men have long used trafficked and coerced women to cement alliances, display status, and enforce silence. The only real differences are the Gulfstream jets, the hidden cameras, and the veneer of Palm Beach civility.

The victims remain overwhelmingly young, poor, often girls from working class families or from broken homes—the same demographic profile colonialism and slavery designated as “available” for violation. 

The perpetrators remain shielded by wealth, political connections, intelligence ties, and a lingering cultural reflex that still whispers: powerful white men are entitled to certain kinds of bodies.

Calling Epstein a “monster” lets the system off the hook. He was not a glitch. He was continuity. 

A reflection of the monstrosity that is white patriarchy, dressed up as colonial desire.

The empire was erected on raped Indigenous women, on raped enslaved Black women, on raped colonized women across continents. That architecture never collapsed—it simply modernized. 

Today it operates through private islands instead of plantations, through NDAs instead of slave codes, through offshore accounts instead of overseer whips. But the organizing logic is identical: white supremacist power structures still fuse racial domination with sexual entitlement. The ability to sexually exploit with near-impunity remains one of the last unapologetic expressions of imperial masculinity.

Until we name white supremacy as the through-line—until we admit that sexual barbarism was never incidental but constitutive—we will keep being “shocked” by the same crime wearing different suits.

Epstein is dead. The machine that produced him is not.

It is time to stop pretending surprise and start dismantling the tradition.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...

The Suit Walks the Corridor

  The Suit Walks the Corridor At ten past nine on a Monday the corridor on the top floor of the administration building fills with the sound of expensive shoes. The carpet up here was laid in the last refurbishment and still gives slightly underfoot, the way a good hotel lobby does, and the doors along it close with the soft, well-engineered thud of a German car. Along this carpet, in the direction of the lift marked Executive, comes the suit. It comes in navy and in charcoal, in the odd daring pinstripe, in the female version too, a tailored jacket over a silk shell, and heels that announce themselves on the tile of the lift lobby a full three seconds before the person arrives. The suit carries a flat white from the good cafe, the one that closed the student cafe to open, and a lanyard that swings with the confidence of a thing that opens doors. The suit passes the framed founding professors, who were photographed in gowns and look, at this distance, like a row of disapproving pe...

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...