Jealousy, that visceral pang of resentment, is a quiet undercurrent in the everyday life of settler colonialism.
It festers in mundane interactions, in workplaces, academic halls, and social media feeds, often cloaked in civility or passive aggression. Whiteness, the hegemonic values of white culture, propped up as universal, continually deploys jealousy under the performance of civility.
Jealousy works as an everyday tool for the expression of white rage at the excellence of people of color.
An excellent public speaker of color, just look at the white rage.
An excellent artist of color, examine the white anger.
An excellent poet of color, just look at the number of white supremacist responses on social media platforms that express outrage. The outrage is multiplied manifold if the person of color is authentic and confident in their excellence. The outrage is magnified exponentially if the person of color expresses pride in her culture through their performance.
When we peel back its layers, we find this culture of jealousy is entangled with power, privilege, and the unremarkable yet pervasive force of white mediocrity—a phenomenon that thrives not on excellence but on systemic advantage, stoking envy in its wake.
The rage and jealousy of whiteness targeting the excellence of
people of color stem from a collision of systemic power dynamics and fragile
privilege. Whiteness, as a structure, thrives on the myth of superiority,
propped up by historical and institutional advantages that often reward
mediocrity among white individuals while demanding exceptionalism from people
of color. When people of color achieve excellence—through brilliance,
resilience, or sheer defiance of systemic barriers—it disrupts this myth. Their
success exposes the unearned nature of white privilege, revealing that the
playing field was never level.
This disruption provokes rage because it threatens the status quo. Excellence from people of color challenges the narrative that whiteness inherently equates to merit.
It forces a confrontation with the reality that many white individuals have coasted on systemic advantages—networks, access, or lowered expectations—rather than superior ability. Jealousy emerges as a defensive response, a way to deflect the discomfort of being outshone by those the system deems "lesser." Instead of introspection, this jealousy often manifests as hostility: microaggressions, gatekeeping, or outright sabotage.
Particularly salient here is the response of whiteness, and its corollary, white mediocrity, to performance of excellence by people of color. The excellence of people of color challenges the carefully cultivated white networks that create, circulate, and protect white privilege. When people of color excel, the overarching supremacy of whiteness is both disrupted and challenged. When people of color excel, the hold of whiteness to pathways of reward through the everyday performance of mediocrity is challenged.
For example, in academia or workplaces, a person of color’s standout work might be scrutinized excessively or dismissed as "niche," while white mediocrity is normalized as "universal." As noted earlier, this rage is amplified when people of color refuse to assimilate into white norms, asserting their excellence on their own terms. It’s not just their success but their audacity to succeed authentically that stings.
The targeting is also strategic.
By undermining or attacking the excellence of people of color, whiteness seeks to restore its dominance, to reassert control over who gets to be seen as "excellent." This is why the rage often feels personal yet is deeply structural—it's less about the individual and more about preserving a system that equates whiteness with worth.
At its core, this dynamic reflects a broader colonial logic: whiteness must diminish the Other to maintain its centrality.
The antidote lies in dismantling these structures—calling out the mediocrity shielded by privilege and amplifying the brilliance of those who succeed despite it.
