Skip to main content

The academic freedom bandwagon and opportunism of Singapore academics


One of the most persistent elements of Singapore academia is its shallow opportunism, its continual ability to place itself along the latest trends.  This culture of "keeping up with the trends" ensures the rankings and high scores on performance metrics. 

This is perhaps most evident in the Humanities and Social Sciences. In Singapore, you discover a sort of performativity that emerges from the structures of the authoritarian state. The performativity translates into the rush for metrics, continually being updated to anticipate the trends and respond to them in adapting research programs, seminars, publications, and so on.

The state has created powerful communicative strategies for its deep authoritarianism by embedding it in everyday practices of its academic institutions. You see this most powerfully play out in the sort of careerist opportunism Singapore cultivates in its academics.

Academic opportunism on one hand, means keeping up with the fads, being ahead of the fads, figuring them out and posturing to them. This capacity to be agile is marketed as the classic Singapore pragmatism. The neoliberal West in pursuit of Asian capital has enabled this, with its metrics turning a blind eye to the authoritarian repression and threats to academic freedom, as long as the "Singapore model" serves as a go-to model for extreme extractive capitalism, achieved through techniques of calibration, in the words of Professor Cherian George, that might not otherwise be visible to an external observer. In fact, for the extreme neoliberals, Singapore's model of repression (including repression of labor organizing and protest) is a necessity for achieving the ease of movement of capital into Asia.

The rise of Trump and the global far-right threat to academic freedom then has also brought about the winds of academic freedom to Singapore, with Singapore academics quick to join the fad, commenting about the far-right, academic freedom and threats to Asian scholarship.

These same academics that jump on the fad on academic freedom are the often the ones to run vicious campaigns, aligned with the agendas of the state, targeting critical academic voices when they challenge the structures of the state. The same academics serve as critical instruments of the state's authoritarian repression directed at expelling critical intellectual voices that render visible the workings of the state.

After all, it is critical to note when discussing the Trump moment and academic freedom in Asia that the Trump legislations are only attempting in minuscule ways to copy what regimes such as the Singapore state have effectively done. 

Colonize and take over the institutional structures of academia to silence, harass, expel critical academic voices is the "Singapore Model." 

It is critical that any serious discussion of academic freedom and Trump in the Asian context attends to the infrastructure of surveillance, erasure, and silencing that states such as Singapore have perfected, with the active collusion of its academic class.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...
Read more