Skip to main content

Civility, Whiteness and Parliamentary Processes: The suspension of Te Pāti Māori MPs


June 05, 2025. 


The New Zealand Parliament voted today to suspend for 21 days two MPs, Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, the co-leaders of Te Pāti Māori, and for seven days the youngest MP, Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke, who had performed the haka in the Parliament in protest to the racist and divisive Treaty Principles Bill.

The Treaty Principles Bill, introduced by the right-wing ACT Party, is reflective of the Far-Right attack on New Zealand political economy, seeking to undo New Zealand's foundational document Te Tiriti O Waitangi.


Fundamentally based on disinformation, the Treaty Principles Bill communicatively inverts the narrative of equality--reflecting similar far-right attacks on equity, dressed up as equality--being witnessed globally.


In response to the introduction of the Bill (the first reading) in the New Zealand parliament, several Members of Parliament (MPs) expressed their opposition to the bill, with the Member of Parliament (MP) of Te Pati Māori Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke tearing a copy of the bill and then leading a haka in New Zealand parliament. Maipi-Clarke was joined by the co-leaders of Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, as well as the Labour MP Peeni Henare.


The MPs were referred to the Parliamentary Privileges Committee, chaired by Judith Collins. In what appeared to be a Partisan decision, achieved without consensus, the Privileges Committee recommended that Maipi-Clarke be suspended for 7 days, and Waititi and Ngarewa-Packer be suspended for 21 days. It is critical to note here that the levels of punishment recommended by the Privileges Committee surpass manifold previous parliamentary punishments, including for acts that were violent in nature.

The politics of civility

After the recommendation, Judith Collins referred to the TPM Members of Parliament breaking the Parliamentary codes of civility. She drew attention to the need for upholding civility in New Zealand Parliamentary processes, and pointed to the lack of civility.

Speaking to Newstalk ZB, Collins stated, “There is a lack of civility now, and it’s unacceptable.”

She went on to suggest that the lack of civility underlies TPM's behavior in Parliament. Observing that the behavior of TPM she observed as unprecedented, Collins reiterated, "We've never had penalties like this in this Parliament before, but that's because we've never seen this sort of behaviour during a vote in the House. I've never seen anything like it. This was a very sad day for Parliament."


 

Whiteness and politics of civility


The politics of civility on display here is anchored in the organizing habits of whiteness. Whiteness upholds the values of white culture as universal, simultaneously obfuscating the white values that underlie accepted norms of communication and imposing these values as the defining logics that determine the games of participation.


Who gets to participate and who is excluded are therefore determined by the games of whiteness.


The haka, as an expression of Māori cultural values, in this context, may be read as the much needed expression that challenges the racism of the Treaty Principles Bill, seen as an attack on Te Tiriti.


The haka, as giving voice to the marginalised, as a voice infrastructure expressing the resistance of Māori and communities in solidarity with Māori, can be read as the precise and appropriate response to the divisiveness and white supremacy underlying the Treaty Principles Bill.


That the Parliamentary Privileges Committee and the Parliament targets the performance of the haka as a threat to the parliamentary codes of civility makes visible how out-of-step the organizing codes of the Parliament are to the registers of Te Tiriti. Turning to Te Tiriti as the foundational document of Aotearoa means that the very codes and organizing logics determining parliamentary processes need to be interrogated and re-imagined.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...