Skip to main content

How AI understands the uses of the term pseudointellectual used by Hindutva ideologues

Recently, I made a post about the city of Kolkata and its contributions to global intellectual history. 

Figure 1: My original LinkedIn post

In response to the post on LinkedIn, an account launched an ad hominem attack, claiming his city Bangalore is better than my city Kolkata (although I didn't really claim in the post that Kolkata is my city), followed by calling Kolkata a city that produces pseudointellectuals like me. 

Full disclosure, I did point to the person posting that Bangalore is a hub of Hindutva hate, that produces misogynist Hindutva disinformation on technological platforms and circulates this hate on platforms (posting the link to the following blogpost about the #BrahminGene campaign that was launched by a Bangalore-based entrepreneur: The ideological infrastructures of racist Brahminism, Indian techno-capital, and architectures of violence).

The term pseudointellectual is often used by Hindutva to discredit critical analyses of Hindutva propaganda. 

So, I turned to an AI platform, ChatGPT, asking it to define for me how Hindutva ideologues use the term "pseudointellectual." 

Here's what ChatGPT produced. I think it is pretty accurate. What do you think?

"The term "pseudointellectual" is often used in Hindutva discourse as a strategic label to attack critics, particularly those who question or challenge the ideology's core tenets. Hindutva, a right-wing Hindu nationalist ideology associated with organizations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), has employed this term in several key ways:

  1. Dismissal of Intellectual Opposition: Hindutva supporters use the term "pseudointellectual" to discredit critics as pretenders to genuine intellectualism. The label suggests that these critics do not possess true intellectual rigor but instead promote a distorted or fake understanding of issues. This is often directed at scholars, journalists, or activists who criticize the ideology, particularly those who advocate for secularism, pluralism, or a more inclusive understanding of Indian history and culture.

  2. Contradiction of Nationalist Narratives: Many intellectuals who challenge Hindutva’s emphasis on a singular, exclusionary vision of Hindu identity are labeled "pseudointellectuals." This is especially true for those who question the historical narratives promoted by Hindutva, such as the portrayal of pre-colonial India, the relationship between Hindus and Muslims, and the role of minorities. By labeling them as "pseudointellectuals," Hindutva adherents undermine the credibility of those who offer alternative views on Indian society, history, or culture.

  3. Skepticism of Western Influence: The term is also used to criticize intellectuals who are perceived as influenced by Western liberal or Marxist ideas. Hindutva positions itself as a more authentic representation of Indian culture, in opposition to what it sees as the imposition of foreign ideologies. Critics, particularly those with academic leanings, are accused of being "pseudointellectuals" because their ideas are perceived as detached from "Indian values" and influenced by Western or post-colonial thought.

  4. Undermining Secularism: The Hindutva ideology is often critical of secularism in India, viewing it as a concept imposed by colonial powers that has diluted India's Hindu identity. Secularism is frequently promoted by intellectuals as a central tenet of Indian democracy, but Hindutva advocates call such intellectuals "pseudointellectuals" for defending a system they believe undermines the Hindu-majority character of India.

  5. Cultural and Political Conformity: The term is also used to pressure intellectuals and critics into conforming to the political and cultural norms set by the Hindutva movement. By labeling someone as a "pseudointellectual," the movement seeks to delegitimize them, creating an atmosphere where dissent or critical thinking is viewed as a betrayal of the nation or an act of intellectual dishonesty.

In summary, the use of the term "pseudointellectual" by Hindutva is a tool for discrediting and marginalizing critics, particularly those who oppose the ideological foundations of Hindu nationalism, secularism, or the rewriting of history to suit the narrative of the Hindutva movement."

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...
Read more