Skip to main content

An aggregated profile of a Sanghi loser: Disasters, hate, and Hindutva extremists

Figure 1: The techno capitalist losers that form the networked infrastructure of Hindutva

The Sanghi is the definition of loser

Loser, is "a person who is incompetent or unable to succeed."

I have argued in previous work that the extremist ideology of Hindutva is networked globally by an information infrastructure of financial and technological capital.
 
Engineering students, techies, coders, and night shift call workers make up the software and hardware that produce and mainstream Hindutva hate.
 
The Sanghi hate producer is your definition of the term loser, having failed in life and mostly stuck in a rut in India's stagnant economy, playing call center functions for global techno-capital. Techno-capital, with its spurious designations and seductive naming of positions that mean nothing, propel this infrastructure of hate, based on disinformation, continual production of lies, and an ecosystem based on lies. 

Bereft of a moral axis, the Sanghi loser knows and perfects the art of lying. She knows the Islamophobic bile she spreads and draws pleasure in spreading the bile. A casual Islamophobic statement or a joke based on Islamophobic hate is part of the everyday banter.
 
Her participation in the infrastructure of hate grows from the deep sense of nothingness, at not having an identity at all. 

In this sense, the techie Sanghi loser is in perpetual search for visual and material markers of identity, beach vacations, shopping sprees, serial flings, and designer bags, captured in platform moments. 

These material markers of show, drawn from the capitalist excesses of extreme neoliberalism, and driven by unfettered and immoral greed, are carefully put together to masquerade the emptiness of identity that drives the Sanghi loser. 

The Sanghi loser is disaster

Disaster, noun, "a person or thing that is a complete failure."

The Sanghi loser is the case study definition of a disaster, a complete failure. The loser as complete failure however perfects the art of gaslighting, dressing up this failure in the language of success, achievement, and mobility. 

The loser's skills at faking it work through a web of carefully crafted communicative inversions. 

The Sanghi's image is packaged to communicate a message of success, communicatively inverting the actual disaster the loser is. Further, the work of "faking it" works through continual downplaying of the actual empirical markers of life. Activists, academics, intellectuals and organizers challenging the hate politics of Hindutva by speaking truth to power are marked and defined as disasters, their courageous activism against fascist power is portrayed as disaster in Sanghi propaganda. 

If you stand up for India's dalits, Muslims, and other marginalized communities, you become a loser or disaster in Sanghi propaganda. Consider here the narrative of "urban naxals" deployed by category exemplars of disaster, Vivek Agnihotri, Arnab Goswami et al. to target dissenting voices challenging Hindutva's hate politics.

The easy-to-grab markers of neoliberal success through lies, deception, and propaganda, juxtaposed in the backdrop of the actual position of playing servile third-world data aggregators for global techno-capital, insulted every day by the hierarchy of whiteness of U.S. capital, shape the Sanghi loser's participation in hate politics. 

The dark spaces of everyday immoralities, narrated as ongoing deceptions and normalized as neoliberal excesses, legitimize through cascading effects, the extremist hate politics of Hindutva. 

Take the example of the then-18-year-old woman Shweta Singh, a prime suspect behind the Bulli Bai conspiracy in 2022 in which photos of several prominent Muslim women were posted for virtual auction on an app, without their consent. A student preparing for engineering exams, Shweta was using a fake Twitter handle with the name JattKhalsa07, posting extremist, often sexually violent hate content targeting Muslims, specifically Muslim women. Shweta was part of an extremist network cell working through multiple layers of decision-making and directions to post hate-based Islamophobic messages and images. She served as an extremist intermediary, sending out instructions to lower-level tech workers in the hate industry, morphing, editing, and uploading images of Muslim women.

Shweta Singh and her extremist collaborators are all less-than-average engineering students who seek mobility in the proliferating infrastructures of third and fourth-grade engineering institutions that have sprung up across India. For this category of losers with below mediocre grades, the neoliberal tech sectors offer the promise of mobility and career. As losers, they form the infrastructure of the disaster that is extremist Hindutva. As disasters, insignificant, shallow, and subhuman, their immorality and greed, the desire to earn money at any cost to show off markers of success on Insta platforms, drives the terrorism of Hindutva. 




Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri