Skip to main content

On Gandhi Jayanti: Deception and the Hindutva way of life


Gandhi's experiments with truth offer a powerful register for resistance to the communicative resources of deception that form the essential infrastructures of Hindutva. 

As Gandhi invites us to critically interrogate our own relationship with non-violence, peace, service, relationship with the community, and resistance to colonization, he offers anchors for life as practice, lived through struggles for truth. 

These anchors of life as practice, realized through struggles for truth stand in resistance to the deceptions that shape the cognitive, affective, and material resources of Hindutva. 

Consider the deception played by Hindutva propagandists in mobilizing violence targeting Gandhi, resulting in his murder, in the ongoing vilification of Gandhi within private spaces while simultaneously upholding Gandhi as an Indian cultural icon in its public messages to the world.


As a fascist ideology, Hindutva thrives on the production and circulation of lies, continually at work to vilify India's Muslim minorities. 

This deception, communicating contradictory and conflicting messages internally and externally, actively producing misinformation, and mobilizing violence on the basis of the misinformation, lies at the crux of the organizing of hate as a technique for rule. 

Deception forms the everyday habits of Hindutva, drawing from the Brahminical hierarchy that gives it its conceptual formation. Brahminism as the underlying feature of Hindutva mobilizes the practices of deception.

From the active production of disinformation in the form of conspiracy theories to practices based on lies in everyday life, the communicative infrastructure of Hindutva thrives on deception.

Dominant approaches to countering the disinformation and hate propagated by Hindutva turn to fact-checking, correcting the misinformation with accurate information. The assumption underlying these approaches suggests that correcting the misinformation would change the belief of the recipient of the message. 

In contrast, theorizing the concept of deception as an everyday practice of Hindutva suggests that deception makes up the cognitive and affective infrastructure of Hindutva. At the crux of Hindutva is its immorality as a conceptual register. Techniques of deception thus are entirely necessary and intrinsic to Hindutva's survival and reproduction. 

The theorizing of deception as an everyday practice of Hindutva therefore outlines the role of the pedagogy of truth as the basis for countering Hindutva. 

Such a pedagogy of truth would turn to everyday practices of life, living, and community engagement as the anchors for re-organizing the toxic hate that holds up and perpetuates Hindutva.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...
Read more