Skip to main content

The whiteness of capitalist publishing models: Decolonizing conversations must interrogate the economics of publishing


 

As an editor of a major communication journal that is committed to praxis, I have been reflecting on what the practical politics of publishing looks like even as our disciplinary associations pronounce our commitments to diversity, inclusion, and decolonization.

How far can we decolonize when our publishing models are based on, held up by, and dependent on the publishing infrastructure of large publishing transnational corporations? 

Almost all of these large publishing transnational corporations are based in Europe/America, rooted in colonial logics of extraction.

The colonial logic underpinning these publishing corporations is evident in the fundamental logic of profiteering that shapes academic publishing. 

Journals are set up as platforms to publish scholarship, built as infrastructures to generate revenues for transnational publishing corporations.

From editors to editorial review board members to reviewers, an entire chain of unpaid or poorly paid academic labour holds up the journal infrastructure. 

As academics, we are trained into counting this work of peer reviewing as integral to our academic identities. We must perform this unpaid labour as a service to the profession. 

The countless hours of work reviewing manuscripts, editing them, and dialoguing with authors through the peer review process are unpaid, based on the expectation that this is part of the academic job.

Yet, the mechanics of the publishing process and the economic logic of the publishing platforms are entirely opaque to us. 

I am struck by how often colleagues have no idea about the revenue streams and revenues generated from journals. 

For instance, what is the actual revenue generated by a journal? What percentage of this is profit? How much of the profit is retained by the publisher? How much of the profit is distributed to the association? How is the revenue, if any, distributed to the association, put to use?

These questions largely remain unanswered, with a publishing framework that is largely opaque to academics.

With the increasing and rapid globalization of publishing, much of the actual labour in the publishing process is shipped out to knowledge process outsourcing centres in the Global South. 

Knowledge labourers in the Global South perform the various tasks of managing the platform, from coordinating the flow of manuscripts to copy-editing the manuscripts, often at poorly paid wages. 

This process of academic production then reproduces an extractive colonial economy where the Global South is exploited for cheap labour. 

The irony then is striking that even as we publish articles on decolonizing our journals, we do so to reproduce a predatory model that exploits cheap labour from the Global South. 

The irony of the whiteness of diversity and inclusion in journal publishing lies in its incorporation of decolonization talk to create and reproduce the whiteness of the capitalist publishing model that largely profits white, western capital.

Serious decolonization work therefore must agitate to undo this predatory model of journal publishing.


Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...
Read more

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...
Read more

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...
Read more