Skip to main content

Activist labour and academia as extraction

Dutch East India Company: Getty Images

Academia as a colonizing structure is built on the extraction of knowledge from communities. 

In the academic study of resistance, community struggles, social movements, and transformative organizing turn into data, as sources of information to be extracted. 

Embedded within the colonial architecture of the modern University, the academic study of activism and resistance strategies replicates the colonial habits that are widespread in the everyday organizing of academia. 

Intrinsic to the organizing of the academic study of activism and resistance is the lack of commitment to the actual labor of the struggle in the community. 

Resistance as the field is an object to be mapped out, categorized, and drawn out into conceptual threads. Hegemonic theories of resistance thus draw on the actual production of distance between the academic and the struggle, normalizing the lack of commitment among academics.

This lack of commitment takes various forms. 

In most visible ways, the lack of commitment takes the form of distance from the ground. 

From a quick trip to a movement location to then write up journal articles and entire books, to easy-to-do interviews with activists and community organizers, to focus groups with activists, these methods of the mainstream invisibilize the question of commitment. 

In other instances, you have academics as ethnographers conducting participant observations of activist organizing, while maintaining their distance from the actual work of activism and safeguarding their cushy jobs. 

Activism as a cultural site turns into a specimen to be observed, taken notes on, and extracted from for scholarly publications.

Academics can claim radical credentials, far removed from the harms, violence, and threats deployed by power toward resistive struggles at and from the margins.

The culture-centered approach (CCA) agitates against this extractive impulse of academia by foregrounding the concept of "body on the line."

In the CCA, the theorizing of community-led resistance as the basis of structural transformation is embedded in solidarities that are carefully stitched together by community organizers, academics, and activists. 

The role of the academic, with our "bodies on the line," is held in friendships with communities and activists, responding to the day-to-day challenges of organizing, doing the material labour of organizing at the margins, gathering material resources, and most vitally, responding collectively to power when it targets the struggles.

The academic labour of the CCA is also activist labour, is intricately weaved into the rhythms of community organizing, co-creating communicative infrastructures for the voices of the margins to emerge. These voices of the margins, nurtured and supported by caring relationships and networks of solidarity, become the registers through which social change is materialized.

The theory of social change in the CCA thus has to begin with the change. It has to incessantly commit to decolonizing the very habits that constitute the academe.

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...