Skip to main content

Why social justice lies at the heart of interfaith dialogues


Social justice, the articulations of justice rooted in equality, attend to the question of human dignity for all, especially for those at the margins of societies.

Amidst the global rise of the far-right and its infrastructure of hate, social justice forms the dialogic anchor for resistance. 

Given the role of religion in the attacks carried out by the far-right, interfaith dialogues are key registers for social justice. 

Through the conversational spaces created for diverse faiths, registers can be built to organize against the politics of hate. 

In these interfaith conversations, majority communities have a vital role to play in listening to the articulations of justice at the margins, in fostering the spaces for claiming human dignity, and in building infrastructures for religious freedom.

In India, the rise of the far-right Hindu nationalist forces is embodied in the mobilization for Hindu nation (Hindu rashtra). This Hindu nation is built on the monolithic imposition of Hindu sanskriti (culture) by a Hindu jati (race). 

This racist conceptual basis of Hindutva manifests in organized attacks on religious minorities, both symbolically and materially.

The mobilization of attacks on mosques  is a key feature of Hindutva. Hindutva has mobilized its political power through the symbolic and material attacks on mosques and praying spaces of Muslims. The ascendance to political power of Hindutva in the mid-1990s was organized through the attack on the Babri masjid. 



In recent months, between August and December 2021, we have witnessed multiple ongoing attacks of Hindutva goons on the praying spaces of Muslims across India. We have witnessed images including photos and videos of Hindutva armies attacking Muslims performing prayers in open spaces. These material attacks have been mobilized by Hindutva narratives suggesting Muslims are taking over public spaces.



Similar attacks have been carried out on Churches, convents, and Christmas celebrations. In the past several days, around Christmas, we have witnessed Christmas celebrations being attacked. Video narratives document Hindutva hoodlums taking over Christmas celebrations with children and shouting Hindutva slogans.


In an irony that is both comic and ominous, in a video, Hindutva groups are witnessed chanting "Down with Santa Claus" and burning effigies of Santa Claus.

To counter the violence of Hindutva targeted at religious minorities in India and in the Indian diaspora, inter-faith dialogues are urgently necessary. 

A culture-centered turn to interfaith dialogues foregrounds the voices of the margins as the basis of building the dialogues. Centering the voices of India's Muslim, Christian, Sikh, and other diverse minorities is vital to countering the hate propagated by Hindutva.

In the Indian diaspora globally, centering the voices of India's diverse religious minority communities in interfaith dialogues is a key ingredient to witnessing the oppression carried out by Hindutva, to documenting the pernicious effects of this oppression, and to countering the oppression. 

The whiteness of the dominant approaches to interfaith dialogue that see interfaith as the spaces to avoid conflicts by silencing conversations on difficult topics, is complicit in the perpetuation of violence. The erasure of the voices of Indian religious minorities in the diaspora and the centering of Hindutva voices in interfaith spaces perpetuate the grotesque violence of Hindutva in the Indian diaspora. 

The unseeing and erasure along with the platforming of Hindutva ideologues in interfaith spaces is disempowering, is an attack on the dignity of Indian minorities, and threatens the religious freedoms of minority Indian communities at the "margins of the margins" of the diaspora. 

We must organize to decolonize the whiteness of interfaith spaces to build registers for actual religious freedom at the margins. The white tastes of universality holding up dialogue as erasure are complicit in the reproduction of violence. These tastes and their affinities must be dismantled to enable the articulations of justice.

 

 

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...