Skip to main content

Hindutva, hate, and rape culture: The communicative inversions that whitewash



The political ideology of Hindutva is built on the infrastructure of hate, and in turn, holds up the circulation of hate. 

The hate that is circulated on digital platforms is created, produced, and funded by brick-and-mortar organizations. In this sense, the hate that is rendered viral through digital platforms is rooted in material presence. 

The online world is sustained by and held up by the offline world. 

Digital infrastructures are integral to the consolidation of Hindutva hegemony.

The digital armies of Hindutva deploy social media infrastructures to circulate hate. 

These social media infrastructures pick their targets, draw on their networks to create campaigns, and continue to amplify the messages of hate.

Threats of sexual violence are key tools in this infrastructure of hate. An overarching rape culture produces the threat of rape, amplifying toxic messages of othering. The recent targeting of the nine-month-old daughter of the captain of the Indian cricket team with rape threats after India lost a match to Pakistan is reflective of this rape culture.

What is particularly salient about the rape threat targeted at Kohli's daughter is the profile of the person issuing the threat from a troll account. 

A graduate from the elite Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), a software engineer who was headed to a graduate programme in a US university before he was arrested. Worth noting are the strategies of seeding hate tied to Hindutva. When the rape threat was called out on Twitter, the account handle was changed to appear as a Muslim account, projecting itself as a Pakistani cricket fan. These communicative inversions, directed at seeding and circulating hate, form the infrastructures of Hindutva.

Also salient is the narrative of the family, suggesting that the threat was posted as an accident.

As with the family denying the sexual violence, Hindutva organizations profiting from the hate forsake ownership of the digital hate. 

After having directed the armies of trolls to circulate the hate, they will tell you, "We have nothing to do with the online hate." Even better, they will put up statements such as "We denounce all forms of online trolling." The denial of ownership of the hate while actively feeding the armies of digital hate is communicative inversion, propping up the rhetoric of Hinduism preaching the oft-parroted slogans, "The whole world is one" and "Diversity in unity." The inversion is further perfected through the turning of the blame on the target, with statements suggesting the target brought the hate on themselves.

One of the most traumatizing features of the attacks targeting me has been the threats/narratives of sexual violence, deeply embedded in Islamophobia. 

These narratives seek to produce the silencing effect that is complementarily organized through letter-writing campaigns, petitions etc. The digital infrastructure of hate is based fundamentally on the disinformation that forms the communicative structure of the letters, petitions etc. 

The emails shared below originate from an account with an Islamophobic fake name, embodying the communicative devices used by Hindutva trolls.



For Hindutva organizations, this digital hate is conveniently obfuscated through a wide range of communicative inversions. While giving legitimacy to the disinformation and feeding off it, Hindutva organizations will claim they have nothing to do with these digital infrastructures of hate. This erasure forms the basis of communicative inversions performed by Hindutva, where Hindutva forces perform the narrative of grievance while spreading and feeding hate through their disinformation infrastructures.

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit
Read more

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a
Read more