Skip to main content

The violence of whiteness and Hindutva: Colonial formations


Whiteness, the hegemonic structure that imposes the values of white culture on diverse communities across the globe, is the key organizing instrument of colonization. It works through the creation, reproduction, and circulation of binaries. The creation of binaries is an essential element of the colonizing project, forming the infrastructure of the divide and rule policy that makes up the administrative apparatus of colonialism. 

British colonial rule drew on this fundamental logic of whiteness to seed division and circulate hate, reproducing hate to serve the hegemony of colonial rule. 

The whiteness of colonialism in British India drew on and catalyzed Brahminical forms of power and control and Islamic fundamentalism to seed hate. The 1905 partition of Bengal epitomized this infrastructure of hate, imposing the geographic division of Bengal along colonial lines with the goal of quelling the anticolonial resistance.

Both the political formation of Hindutva as ethno-nationalism and Islamic fundamentalism organised toward a monolithic nation state emerged out of this colonial formation. Hindutva, the articulation of a Hindu nation organised on the principles of religion, is a modern project, mired in whiteness and its colonial ambitions. 

The structure of hate deployed by Hindutva works through the ongoing production of the Muslim "other" and is rooted in the whiteness of the colonial project. Consider the writings of one of the key architects of Hindutva, MS Golwalkar:

"German race pride has now become the topic of the day. To keep up the purity of the race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the Semitic Races - the Jews ... a good lesson for us in Hindustan for us to learn and profit by."

Note here the deep interplays of the ideology of Hindutva and white supremacy. The purity of race and culture that forms the hate structure of white supremacy is mobilized in the political formation of Hindutva. Hindutva embodies the colonial imposition of a politics of purity through the purge of the "other" organised  by the state.

In its ambitions, as a colonial project, Hindutva is fundamentally antithetical to the diverse, plural, often contested forms of Hinduisms that make up the cultural fabric of India. The Hindu nation it imagines must colonize the diverse forms of Hinduisms to impose a monolithic Brahminical structure from the North. The violence propelled by Hindutva is integral to this colonizing structure.

Moreover, it writes over the diverse spaces and contexts of syncretism, dialogue, and creative conversations across faith traditions evident across India. It actively communalizes these spaces to achieve its political agenda of colonization. It targets Indigenous communities across India with their diverse spiritual practices, seeking to impose on these communities a monolithic ideology.

The decolonization work of CARE seeks to co-create voice infrastructures at the "margins of the margins." In the context of CARE's ongoing work in India and in the Indian diaspora, this decolonization is constituted in the co-creation of voice infrastructures for the minoritized, raced, classed, gendered margins. 

As an ongoing element of this decolonization work, I published a white paper titled “Cultural Hindutva and Islamophobia." The paper outlines the cultural strategies that disseminate Hindutva, an ethno-nationalist strategy that constructs India as a Hindu nation. The essay reflects the broader argument of the culture-centered approach that interrogates cultural essentialisms in the service of colonialism and capitalism, and simultaneously seeks to co-create communicative infrastructures for diverse voices at the "margins of the margins."

The paper depicts the cultural pedagogy of International Chinmaya Mission as rooted in the ideology of Hindutva. The observation that Swami Chinmayananda, the founder of the International Chinmaya Mission, was also involved in the creation of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), a militant religious organisation that has been linked to violence, the paper calls for closer examination of cultural elements of Hindutva in New Zealand.

On August 21, in response to a talk posted by CARE on twitter on Hindutva and Hinduphobia, X (a white woman claiming to be a yogini) responded, tagging me and the University, "I just read the white paper, Hindutva and Islamophobia where the Chinmaya Mission is called the hub of Hindutva and accused of hate crimes against muslims. If that is correct, @MasseyUni should be able to provide evidence to other scholars. I did not see any and it is disturbing."

The tweet intentionally sets up a false narrative. It strategically unsees  the evidence that is presented in the paper, which X later draws upon  and communicatively inverts in a blog piece to drive up the hate. Note the internal inconsistency here. X could either claim there was no evidence presented in the paper or could claim that she disagreed with the quality of evidence. Also worth noting is the intellectual dishonesty in the dismissal of evidence, where X refers to the Economic and Political Weekly as a Mumbai charity journal with academic credibility issues. To raise the question of credibility targeting the EPW, she cites an article referring to the political pressures on the EPW to retract an article critical of the Adani Group, a group that has concentrated power since the rise of Modi. The article linked by X to discard the quality of EPW specifically refers to an open letter signed by renowned academics including Nobel Economic prize winners Amartya Sen and Angus Deaton, stating its historically high standards, then noting:

India is currently living through a dark period in which there are real concerns about freedom and independence of intellectual expression, both for academics and journalists, with significant corporate takeover of major media houses and increasing instances of overt and covert intimidation of independent thinking and debate. 

The articles referred to in the CARE white paper were both published in a timeframe that falls outside of this dark period referred to in the article.

When told that they didn't have the skillset to read the arguments of the paper, X responded,

Asking you, as a scholar for evidence that Chinmaya are accountable for hate crimes is not bullying. Your white paper either needs references or you can prove it now.”

They went on to tweet a number of twitter handles known to be organised around the narratives of Hindutva and Hinduphobia.

Note here the rhetorical fallacy, producing rhetorical slippages to produce a false narrative, which is then deployed to organize a bullying campaign, seeking legitimacy in the Hindutva hate infrastructure.

The tweets from X need to whitewash the hateful ideology of Hindutva to build the structure of legitimacy. 

“I just read Sarvarkar Hindutva and can't find a single sentence of hatred. Do these Dismantling Hindutva people even bother to read their own bloody references? It said, 'there's only one race, the human race'. Our first nations folk say exactly the same thing. People don't read.”

Note here the performance of erasure, a key tool of colonization, to actively delete the scholarship on Savarkar and the ideology of hate, produced by Indians. The structures of whiteness work through the erasure of critical knowledge generated from within contexts and from within communities by scholars residing in those communities and engaged in struggles against the apparatus of hate.

Also significant here is the act of equating Savarkar's Hindutva ideology of hate with the first nations people. This is another layer of colonial violence, with the structure of whiteness at work to impose on Indigenous people facing the everyday oppressions of whiteness in a settler colonial state a pernicious ideology of hate. In all this posturing, X of course conveniently erases their white colonial ancestral lineage and how that connects with the ongoing oppression of Indigenous communities in the settler colonial state. It is the expertise of whiteness that must take over the mantle of defending Indigenous people by erasing Indigenous voices, and by simultaneously imposing a racist ideology on Indigenous people that reproduces the colonial architecture.

The white paper then gets picked up by Stop Hindu Hate Advocacy Network (SHHAN),

“@MasseyUni professors have written white paper accusing @ChinmayaMission of spreading hate against Muslims without any evidence. @EducationGovtNZ baseless targeting of Hindu students is unacceptable. Indian students pay fees to study in NZ, pls do not sully your reputation.”

Note here the rhetorical fallacy constructed by X that gets picked up by the Stop Hindu Hate Advocacy Network. The production of the concern for Hindu students turns the critique of Hindutva into a question of safety for Hindu students. Moreover, Hindu students are then turned into Indian students. This rhetorical move is at the heart of the colonizing forces of Hindutva that seek to obliterate the diversities within India, and by extension among Indian students, by incorporating them into a monolithic category organized under Hindutva. Note here the colonial erasure performed on Hindus. Under this ideology, the only Hindus are the ones that identify under the ideology of Hindutva. The production of the Indian student as being targeted because of the particular critique of Hindutva as an ethnoreligious ideology renders visible the colonizing ideology of Hindutva. 

The notion that the safety of Indian students is threatened by a white paper on the cultural strategies of Hindutva forms the basis of the targeted attack on me, on CARE, and on the University. This rhetorical strategy is photocopied directly from the strategies being used to attack the conference "Dismantling Global Hindutva."

The tweet by SHHAN is then shared by X, “Surprise surprise. Chinmaya has finally found out about the white paper. This is called academic freedom, when you give all sides the opportunity to speak. If you take a look at the evidence for this report, don’t go bashing the Professor on his wall. Take it to Massey.”

They offer strategies, asking the posters to delete their comments and write to the University.

Worth noting here are the interplays of the strategies of harassment. Urging protestors to write to the University is the tactic of harassment of the networks of Hindutva to silence academic freedom. 

Consider the strategies of hate from twitter accounts that label me a Maoist and a Communist. The assumption of my Bengali background are used to label me a Maoist. Consider similarly explicit forms of sexual violence targeting me that reproduce the ideology of racist whiteness, and that are reproduced by X with the statement "This one made me laugh." The hate catalyzed by X on a YouTube  video targeting CARE builds the infrastructure for attacks on BIPOC South Asian academics, including BIPOC women organizing in solidarity with CARE and with the "Dismantling Global Hindutva" conference. 

This targeted bullying is accompanied by the performance of victimhood by co-opting the language of social justice.  

The co-option of the rhetoric of social justice that forms a key element of struggles against power and control into a politics of hate is the very basis of silencing critiques. Any critique of Hindutva and its pernicious effects on the "margins of the margins" is constructed as unsafe, labelled as bullying, and targeted as Hinduphobia. Similarly, the language of decolonization is communicatively inverted to hold up a deeply colonizing structure of hate rooted in whiteness. And of course, the decolonizing work is carried out by a white woman embedded within the networks of privilege of the settler colonial state.

This communicative inversion is a key strategy of whiteness that erases the violence of its colonizing force. 

The production of the victim to uphold Hindutva supremacy mirrors the production of the victim in white supremacy. Consider the parallels between the strategy of victimhood deployed by the structures of Hindutva and the attack on Critical Race Theory deployed by white supremacists under the Trump administration in the U.S.

Note here the whitesplaining at work to save Hinduism from a brown-skinned Hindu. I am produced in this discourse as the bad Hindu, the brown sepoy, that is the threat to Hinduism.  Also worth noting is the performance of the classic trope of white victimhood that is integral to the colonial-carceral project.

The marking of my body, my decolonizing work and the decolonizing practice of CARE as the deviant "other" that must be disciplined offers the cultural cache for a white woman to seek legitimacy and gain currency in the networks of Hindutva. A twitter account with hardly few "likes" usually picks up the "likes" by tagging Hindutva ideologues and mobilizing them to attack me. My and our imaginations of Hinduism as polymorphic practices and syncretic dialogues rooted in dialectics must be attacked violently and erased to establish the monolithic colonizing agenda of Hindutva. My whakapapa engaging with syncretic Hinduisms must be erased to mark me as the heathen to be civilized. 

It is this colonizing force of Hindutva that is the threat to the plural and polymorphic imaginaries of Hinduism, to the progressive possibilities of transformation, and to the ongoing work of decolonization.

It is paradoxical that Hindutva ideologues that attack scholars located in the West who critically document the dangers of the pernicious ideology of Hindutva draw on whiteness to circulate their politics of hate. This paradox is rooted in Hindutva as a fundamentally colonial project, deeply intertwined in whiteness. Hindutva needs its white saviors to give it fuel.

It is only in the dismantling of Hindutva that plural Hinduisms can flourish, transform, and progress. It is only in dismantling Hindutva that the ongoing project of Indian democracy rooted in secularism and syncretism can be recovered. Decolonization is dismantling Hindutva.

  

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...