Skip to main content

Whiteness and the co-option of difference: The hegemonic language of health disparities and #HealthCommSoWhite

COVID-19 pamphlet in Bangla targeting migrant workers in Qatar


In a piece published in Communication Theory in 2007, titled "Communicating about culture and health: Theorizing culture-centered and cultural sensitivity approaches," I had outlined the hegemonic forms of co-option of culture into health communication. The dominant approach to health communication, embedded in the individualizing logic of whiteness, turns to cultural essentialism to target diverse cultures with messages that are supposedly aligned with cultural values. In this essay, I argued that this form of incorporating cultural values props up and reproduces the hegemony of whiteness, keeping intact its individualizing logics. 

The dominant approach to health communication  addressing health disparities falls within this cultural sensitivity framework. Cultural characteristics are extracted and then turned into the sites of targeting through communication messages that are designed to respond to the cultural values. For instance, health communication messages speaking to extracted cultural values of African American communities in the U.S. are designed to promote healthy eating behavior among African Americans. The cultural sensitivity approach, although dressed up in a culturalist narrative, is fundamentally racist because it reproduces the hegemonic values of whiteness, constructing diverse cultures as pathologies to be fixed through culturally sensitive messaging strategies.

Erased from the cultural sensitivity framework are the structures of whiteness and racism that shape the struggles at the raced, classes, gendered, colonized, migrant margins, and the many intersections of these identities. Erased are the poor housing conditions, lack of access to decent income, commoditization of food, privatization of healthcare, police racism, societal racism etc. that form the infrastructures of whiteness that fundamentally threaten health and wellbeing.

In the pamphlet targeting low-wage hyper-precarious Bengali workers with COVID-19 information discussed above, the consideration of culture turns into superficial translation and messaging strategies. As workers are recommended to practice individualized health behaviors, poor and crowded housing conditions, the everyday challenges to livelihood, the struggles with securing decent wage amidst COVID-19 are erased from the discursive space (see Dutta, 2020). The erasure of the poor and overcrowded housing conditions that fundamentally constitute the risks of spread of COVID-19 holds up the neoliberal structure of extraction and exploitation.

The culture-centered approach, emergent through the creation of community infrastructures for voice at the raced, classed, gendered, migrant margins, addresses the communicative inequalities in the infrastructures for voice. Health inequalities are situated amidst the interplays of communication inequalities and structural inequalities.

It argues that placing the power of theorizing in the hands of local and Indigenous communities of colour at the margins inverts the whiteness of hegemonic health communication by building theories of transformation embedded in the lived experiences and struggles at the margins. Theorizing community voice amidst the interplays of culture, structure and agency, it seeks to foster openings for communities at the margins to enact their agency through turning of the power of theorizing in the hands of communities. This recognition of community agency as the basis for generating theories of health communication fundamentally dismantles the cognitive injustice propped up by whiteness.

The process of cultural centering at the global margins is fundamentally about dismantling the structures of whiteness and the interconnected forms of neoliberal capitalism that produce health inequalities.

Cultural sensitivity constructs essentialist frames of culture, which are then co-opted into the hegemonic constructions of health to hold up #HealthCommSoWhite. It is vital to critically interrogate and dismantle the logics of cultural sensitivity to build infrastructures for voice that dismantle the structures of neoliberalism and whiteness.

References

Dutta, M. J. (2007). Communicating about culture and health: Theorizing culture-centered and cultural sensitivity approaches. Communication Theory, 17(3), 304-328.

Dutta, M. J. (2020). COVID-19, authoritarian neoliberalism, and precarious migrant work in Singapore: Structural violence and communicative inequality. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 58.



Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more

The difficult conversation we need now: Anti-Māori racism in the upper-caste, upwardly mobile Indian community

  The difficult conversation we need now: Anti-Māori racism in the upper-caste, upwardly mobile Indian community The same Indian community organisations that mobilised quickly around a haka performed at the Tainui regional kapa haka competition have been almost entirely silent on the sustained anti-Māori political project advanced by ACT MP Parmjeet Parmar. Mohan Dutta argues that this asymmetry is not accidental — it is what the model minority script trains us to perform, and it is time for our community to have a much harder conversation. There is a particular asymmetry in how anti-racism is being performed in Aotearoa right now, and the haka–apology cycle around Che Wilson and Parmjeet Parmar throws it into sharp relief. The same Indian community organisations, lobby groups, and outlets that have mobilised quickly and articulately around the haka performed at the Tainui regional kapa haka competition — securing an emailed apology from Wilson, a follow-up apology from Te Pae K...
Read more