Skip to main content

Why we must continue to raise our voice against aggressive Israeli settler colonialism


 

As a decolonization theorist, I find the fundamental question of Israeli settler colonialism as a guiding anchor to my theorizing work. As an exemplar of settler colonialism, the state of Israel continues to perpetuate a wide array of communicative tropes that justify its oppressive practices. 

The oppression of colonialism is communicative. It is established, legitimized, and circulated through communicative resources and architectures.

Israeli settler colonialism works through multiple communicative inversions, the turning of materiality on its head to legitimize the infrastructure of colonial violence.

The communicative infrastructure of Israeli settler colonialism marks the Palestinian people as terrorist to perpetuate its terror. 

Palestinian claims to sovereignty are labeled as terrorist to sustain the Israeli apparatuses of colonial expansion.

The marking of the colonized subject as the source of terror is a fundamental communicative inversion that sustains the colonial project. 

The colonizer has historically used this strategy, couched in the language of emancipation, to carry out its colonizing project. To the colonizer, labeling calls for anti-colonialism as racist, oppressive, terrorist, uncivil, and threats to security is intrinsic to the perpetuation of the oppressive colonizing practices.

This communicative inversion is tied to communicative erasure, the violence of erasing decolonizing articulations. Erasures are legitimized through inversions. Once anti-colonial speech is marked as racist, uncivil, oppressive, and terrorist, the colonizer can deploy the instruments of terror to pathologize and criminalize anti-colonial speech. Consider for instance the ways in which the language of anti-racism is deployed to silence the critics of Israeli settler colonialism. Across the globe, the instruments of settler colonialism networks through powerful structures to create the sites of erasure. Silencing the talk of anti-colonialism works to erase possibilities for decolonization.

It is in this backdrop that we must continue to raise our voices against Israeli settler colonialism. For any decolonization theorist, the call to decolonization must turn to the question of transforming the ongoing violence perpetuated by the colonial Israeli power in Palestine. 

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...