Skip to main content

Whiteness and the violence of "talking behind your back": The multiple layers of culture-centered labour

By Ngā Hau Christine Elers and Mohan Dutta 

One of the vital strategies of whiteness is "talking behind your back." 

Reflecting on this strategy of whiteness, notes Nga Hau:

"I write this as Māori woman, who has endured many experiences in my life, of toxic and racist kōrero conducted behind my back by Pākehā, while undertaking my work duties. Sometimes, eventually that kōrero has made its way back to me. Recovering racist Andrew Judd, explained to our Feilding advisory group of Māori participants, at the end of last year, that is very common for Pākehā to engage in disturbing and even racist kōrero behind our backs, whilst appearing supportive to our faces.  Not only will some Pākehā do that with other like-minded Pākehā but they will also seek out people of colour, including Māori who are receptive to the mechanics of Whiteness to justify their own racism, because if people of colour engage in this type of kōrero then it must be true. And that they begin by targeting one person of colour first."

The violence of the racist strategy of "talking behind your back" is felt in the toxic effects on the body.

Notes Mohan:

"Although I might try to put up a brave face, especially when the violence is collectively experienced, the toxicity stays. It is hard to erase the images of the contorted faces, choreographed to perfection to convey the vigor of disdain while talking behind your back. It is hard to delete the violence of the words used, the abuses thrown at you behind your back. The irony of our work often is that we negotiate this violence while seeking to co-create infrastructures for listening to voices."

The sleepless nights, searing headaches, pain in the neck and backbone, tingling sensations in the fingers, and inability to focus are just some of the symptoms that reflect this voice. In our culture-centered work with communities negotiating health and wellness at the "margins of the margins," negotiating the toxic whiteness embedded in structures through gossips, "talking behind your back" and ongoing gaslighting of the method work to further reproduce the experiences of stress. 

The labour of doing culture-centered work, the many hours in the field spent in conversations, the work of challenging structures, is often situated amidst the labour of negotiating the various toxic strategies of whiteness. "Talking behind your work" is one such strategy that is used by White structures to silence the voices emergent from the margins. To articulate that the talks behind the back must stop is a vital step toward sustaining anti-violence interventions.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

The Suit Walks the Corridor

  The Suit Walks the Corridor At ten past nine on a Monday the corridor on the top floor of the administration building fills with the sound of expensive shoes. The carpet up here was laid in the last refurbishment and still gives slightly underfoot, the way a good hotel lobby does, and the doors along it close with the soft, well-engineered thud of a German car. Along this carpet, in the direction of the lift marked Executive, comes the suit. It comes in navy and in charcoal, in the odd daring pinstripe, in the female version too, a tailored jacket over a silk shell, and heels that announce themselves on the tile of the lift lobby a full three seconds before the person arrives. The suit carries a flat white from the good cafe, the one that closed the student cafe to open, and a lanyard that swings with the confidence of a thing that opens doors. The suit passes the framed founding professors, who were photographed in gowns and look, at this distance, like a row of disapproving pe...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more