Skip to main content

White supremacy, the Trump moment, and the complicity of the political class: Anti-racist interrogations


The expression of White supremacy in the U.S. capitol is not an exception. It exists in continuity with the everyday work of the machinery of White supremacy.

The White supremacist terrorist attack on the U.S. Capitol is reflective of a larger infrastructure of White supremacy. It is in many ways both a mirror and a culmination of the ongoing work of powerful political and economic interests invested in keeping White supremacy alive and in perpetuating it. 

This infrastructure of White supremacy has been held up by the political class, enabled by it, and reproduced by it. 


It has been funded by the capitalist class, finding support in powerful economic forces. 

White supremacist messages have been and continue to be circulated in the mainstream media. Digital infrastructures of White supremacy are funded by powerful economic interests. 

In other words, the political class is complicit in the perpetuation of White supremacy, funded by powerful economic forces. 

It is therefore important for anti-racist interventions to begin by critically interrogating the political economy of White supremacy. 

Following critical questions offer vital starting points to developing anti-racist interventions: Who is funding White supremacy? Who is aligning with White supremacist arguments? Which politician is making White supremacist claims? What are the connections between these White supremacist claims and Trumpian White supremacy? Which politician is voicing the interests of White supremacists? Which businesses are funding the campaigns of these politicians?

This complicity of the political class in protecting and perpetuating White supremacy is well evident in the attacks on both academics and activists that critically interrogate and expose the infrastructures of White supremacy. Consider for instance the sustained and ongoing attacks of politicians on critical race theory (CRT), a conceptual framework that critically interrogates the power dynamics that constitute the production and perpetuation of White supremacy in organisations, social formations, and communities. 

The attack on CRT organised by the Trump-led White House is/was an expression of the White supremacist forces at work seeking to silence critical interrogations of White supremacy. The silencing of critical articulations that challenge White supremacy is vital to the project of White supremacy. Given legitimacy by Trump, the attack on CRT found legitimacy among White supremacist politicians globally including here in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Politicians often use the language of civility to carry out this attack on critics of White supremacy. Consider for instance the many instances where politicians have exerted their powers to contact university managers, demanding that X or Y faculty member be fired. This ongoing attacks on academics by White supremacist politicians have been seeded by White supremacist groups and circulated on White supremacist media. That these politicians in using the force of political power from opaque sites of influence serve the agendas of White supremacy needs to be foregrounded in the conversation. Activists, academics, and the media have vital roles to play in making these linkages visible. Freedom of information requests should be used to track the number of times a politician has contacted a University to make demands that reflect the interests of White supremacist groups. Activists and academics must push Universities to document, including maintaining paper trails of conversations, especially because these influences might be exerted with the purpose of making the influence invisible.

Simultaneously, the political structure and its corresponding security forces draw on the language of freedom of speech to voice White supremacist claims. Police, security structures, academia, and media leave White supremacist unchallenged, with explicit references to freedom of speech. 

Any attempt at universities for instance to protect minority communities against the harm caused by White supremacy is targeted as repression of academic freedom. White supremacists align behind organisations that proclaim to be the advocates for free speech to call for protections of White supremacist speech. These organisations as White supremacist organisations work specifically to protect White supremacy, framing Universities as Left wing bastions. 

The language of taxpayer funding is deployed to build a moral panic, the purpose of which is to precisely safeguard White supremacy. This paradox forms the infrastructure of White supremacy globally. 

The memes, photoshopped images, and strategies of White supremacy travel across spaces. Consider for instance the uptake of the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) slogan here in Aotearoa. 

It is important that we see these White supremacist flows and linkages beyond the U.S. to studying their effects globally. The work of anti-racist interrogations has to begin by questioning the complicity of our political class in perpetuating this infrastructure of hate.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri