Skip to main content

Anger as a register for communicating social change: Dismantling the neoliberal trope of positive emotions


 

One of the most powerful tropes of neoliberal governmentality is happiness. 

Individualizing the anxiety, anguish, and deep sense of insecurity that are the byproducts of five decades of relentless neoliberal transformations, the owners of transnational capital and the enabling structures of the state proselytize us into happy subjects who see inequality, poverty, precarity, and struggles as personal failures. The prescription then is to turn these personal failures into successes in the competitive neoliberal order. 

To succeed in the marketplace, one must first and foremost be happy. One must learn to find joy and be joyful. One must be self-fulfilled so he/she can find fulfillment in the mechanisms of the market. Any failure to attain happiness, joyfulness, and a state of self-fulfillment is a personal failure. 

An entire industry of self-help, pop psychology, meditation, and new age spiritualism has propped up to hold us up to this state of happiness.

This cluster of positive emotions, paraded as the instruments of self actualization amidst the profoundly disenfranchising effects of neoliberal policies, is an essential tool of the free market ideology, performing layers of communicative inversions (Dutta, 2017). As I define in my earlier work, communicative inversions are the turning on its head of materiality. 

A wide array of rhetorical devices are put into place to perform communicative inversions. 

The "positive emotions" tool as a communicative inversion turns the deep anxieties tied to the free market ideology as sites of love, joy, and happiness. 

The individual thrown into the streets and rendered homeless because of the mortgage crisis brought about by predatory lending and extreme profiteering without accountability is prescribed meditation and self-help classes. The worker in a middle class job being fired to enable ongoing profiteering by capital is precsribed a course on self-reflection and finding pleasure. The household struggling to have enough food on the table amidst multiple shifts is offered a class on positive psyschology to cope with the challenges. "Positive emotions"  form the zeitgeist of precsriptive adaptation to the everyday misfortunes among the working classes intertwined with the ever-expanding reach of neoliberal transformations.

Now what would social change mean in this backdrop? Given the deep inequalities, precarity, attacks on the climate, and widespread expulsion of people into networks of precarity, social change is a large-scale change in the policy frameworks and structures that have enabled the grotesque accummulation of capital and power in the hands of the few.

Social change, change in the existing social order, will come about through the work of dismantling neoliberalism. That the ideology of the ever-expanding free market that individualizes responsibility while creating new opportunities for capitalist profiteering needs to be actively resisted, challenged, and taken down forms the basis for social change.

To catalyze for social change as the work of resisting and dismantling the five decades of neoliberal reforms, community organizers, activists, communities at the margins, and academics need to work collectively on building registers that see through the "communicative inversions" performed by neoliberalism. One such fundamental communicative register that inverts the cloak of positive emotions centers anger as the basis of social change.

Anger as a register for communicating social change sees the unacceptable levels of inequalities that have been bred by the neoliberal order and mobilizes to dismantle the neoliberal order itself. 

Anger recognizes that no form of dialogue, politeness, and conversation with the hegemonic social order will bring about the social change that is needed. It therefore foregrounds an altogether different framework for resistance, one that confronts, uses the language of confrontation, and seeks to break open.

Anger recognizes that talks at the World Economic Forum are not the basis of solving problems such as inequalities. Because power in these infrastructures are very much held in the hands of the capitalist class and the state collaborators of the capitalist class. 

With anger, the starting point is the deep understanding that the very class that has organized and orchestrated the inequalities we inhabit today must be dismantled. It begins with the recognition that the grotesque sites of consolidation of power need to be turned upside down.

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...
Read more

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...
Read more

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...
Read more