Skip to main content

Why talk about racism during times of #COVID19? #Racism&COVID19


By Mohan J. Dutta and Nga Hau

 Isn't it divisive to talk about racism in the midst of a pandemic?

 The question posed above is a powerful instrument of erasure. It works precisely to erase the empirically established conclusion that racism makes up the everyday realities of health and health care.

What we learn from the existing scholarship on racism is that globally, communities of colour experience racism throughout their life course and this leaves toxic and sustained effects on the health and wellbeing of individuals, households, and communities.

Whether it is the health of Māori communities in Aotearoa New Zealand, the health of indigenous communities in the U.S., or the health of African American communities in the U.S., racism is built into the social fabric. Racism prevents access to the basic infrastructures of health care, places significant barriers to the negotiation of health care, and impacts the quality of care received by communities of colour. The normative rules and roles written into hegemonic systems constitute the everyday experiences of racism by communities of colour.

 A crisis almost always exacerbates these entrenched forms of racism, magnifying the inequalities within organizations and societies. For instance, organizational decisions that don't take into account the existing inequalities in health outcomes fail to respond to the needs of those at the margins already experiencing health inequalities.

For example, the MP Marama Davidson, pointed to the New Zealand COVID19 response, and questioned the government-issued guideline defining high-risk people as those over 70, instructed to stay at home. She noted: "There has been discussion among Māori health expertise that this should be 60plus for Māori and Pacific kaumatua. Due to health inequities and systemic discrimination, the health profiles for Māori and Pacific have always been different."

 The decision-making around the criterion for what makes up high-risk determines who has access to wage and employer support.

 The acknowledgment of racism and its effects shapes the very nature of response to COVID-19, shaping further the inequalities in access to preventive resources, access to health care, and access to various forms of support.

 The discourse around COVID-19 response reflects the climate of racism in Aoteroa New Zealand.

 An article posted by Stuff "$56m to be spent on Māori coronavirus response package" engenders 1,100 comments in one hour; more comments than any other Stuff article posted today so far. A cursory scroll through the comments reveal a common Kiwi narrative that is deployed to silence the deep racism in Aotearoa – “we are all New Zealanders”. One commenter writes “it makes me said that even in these times we cant all be treated as new zealanders, still the separation. Let’s all just get through this as one people!!”

 Under this mantra, the health inequities and systemic racism shaped by colonialism are rendered invisible. “What about the rest of nz OMG this govt is a bloody joke y [why] the he’ll [hell] should the [Māori] get special treatment am sick of the hand of been given to the wrong people,” writes another commenter.

 Regardless of the minority anti-racist commentors trying to engage in dialogue on this platform to shed light on New Zealand’s perversion to racism, the racist comments freely flow. Even labelling this sharing of resources package to Māori as racist. Another commenter writes “Good to see racism is alive and well in NZ. Promoted and endorsed by our govt” Two thumbs up and liked by 208 people.

 We must absolutely center racism in our conversations on pandemic response. The effects of pandemics are raced, classed, and gendered. Working from this knowledge is critical to developing preventive and health care solutions that are anchored in equality.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

The Suit Walks the Corridor

  The Suit Walks the Corridor At ten past nine on a Monday the corridor on the top floor of the administration building fills with the sound of expensive shoes. The carpet up here was laid in the last refurbishment and still gives slightly underfoot, the way a good hotel lobby does, and the doors along it close with the soft, well-engineered thud of a German car. Along this carpet, in the direction of the lift marked Executive, comes the suit. It comes in navy and in charcoal, in the odd daring pinstripe, in the female version too, a tailored jacket over a silk shell, and heels that announce themselves on the tile of the lift lobby a full three seconds before the person arrives. The suit carries a flat white from the good cafe, the one that closed the student cafe to open, and a lanyard that swings with the confidence of a thing that opens doors. The suit passes the framed founding professors, who were photographed in gowns and look, at this distance, like a row of disapproving pe...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more