Skip to main content

Universities as racist structures: What does it mean to research racism?



I have often wondered this in carrying out our ongoing research on racism and its effects on health and wellbeing in global contexts.

Much like a lot of other things, the scholarship on racism within academia is structured within the logics of Whiteness.

On one hand, to research racism, intersectionality, and forms of inequality is a seductive brand positioning. On the other hand, to commit to dismantling racism in the broader society and in the university structures is a threat to the status quo.

The neoliberal university loves the identity games, what with addressing inequality codified into one of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

You will even contribute to your university's rankings and global "coolness quotient" when you publish on racism.

One will even witness many White scholars studying racism, opining on the presence and extent of racism in society.

It is an altogether different story though when you, as an academic of colour, bring home the research, turning the lens on the university structure itself.

The interrogation of university structures and the logics of racism that constitute them is quickly labeled uncivil, unprofessional, harassment, bullying etc.

The structures of Whiteness respond with complaints about your "incivility" "reverse racism" etc. because, wait, you have turned the lens on the racism that inhabits the university as a structure of knowledge production.

Across classrooms, centers, departments, institutions, academics of colour have been targets of racist attacks for speaking out against racism that occupies academe and voicing their pain amidst the structural inequalities codified into universities.

When these attacks take place, more often than  not, the White scholars that make careers out of writing about racism, adjustment, and cross-cultural communication go missing.

They are quick in their distancing from scholars of colour and our sruggles to dismantle racism.

Such extractive relationships that turn painful stories of experiences of racism into publications often thrive on the circulation of the racist ideology. The existence of racism offers a research topic to study, rather than offering an embodied site for solidarity. It is only when racism turns from a research topic into a site for the everyday work of anti-racist practice can we start imagining societies built on equality.

Popular posts from this blog

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit...

Upper caste Indian women in the diaspora, DEI, and the politics of hate

Figure 1: Trump, Vance and their partners responding to the remarks by Mariann Edgar Budde   Emergent from the struggles of the civil rights movement , led by African Americans , organized against the oppressive history of settler colonialism and slavery that forms the backbone of US society, structures around diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) formed an integral role in forging spaces for diverse recognition and representation.  These struggles around affirmative action, diversity, equity and inclusion were at the heart of the changes to white only immigration policies, building pathways for migration of diverse peoples from the Global South.  The changes to the immigration policies created opportunities for Indians to migrate to the US, with a rise of Indian immigration into the US since the 1970s into educational institutions, research and development infrastructures, and technology-finance infrastructures. These migratory structures into the US were leveraged by l...

The Projection Machine: Epstein's Intellectual Network and the War on Trans People

The anti-transgender activist Posie Parker in Aotearoa NZ An Industry Built on Inversion Anti-transgender hate is an industry. Not a movement, not a moral concern, not an organic uprising of worried parents — an industry, deliberately constructed, lavishly funded, and strategically deployed to protect the interests of the powerful men who finance it. And like most industries built on fear, it requires a credible monster. Transgender people — a community representing roughly one percent of the population, facing disproportionate rates of poverty, violence, suicide, and discrimination — have been selected for that role with remarkable precision. The 2025–2026 release of the Jeffrey Epstein files has made something newly visible that was always structurally present: the men who built the ideological infrastructure of anti-trans politics are, in many cases, the same men — or the direct intellectual descendants of the same men — who moved through the social world of a convicted child sex tr...