Skip to main content

Stigma and the politics of labels: Decolonizing racism


One of the strongest emergent themes in our fieldwork on experiences of racism in Singapore is the use of the "dirty Indian" label that is thrown at Indians by members of the Chinese majority in Singapore. 

Participants in our fieldwork often describe experiences of being harassed with labels associated with dirt. These experiences of being labeled as dirty span the lifecourse, from childhood to schools and the university to workplaces to community interactions to media portrayals to interactions on social media. 

Brown skin colour is equated with dirt in the hegemonic Chinese construction in Singapore, and in many other Chinese majority countries across East and Southeast Asia. 

The term "smelly apu nene" for instance gets used by members of the Chinese majority culture as a tool for discriminating against Indians, often in playgrounds, at other times in classrooms, and yet at other times in workplaces. 

Indian women discuss experiences of being targets of racist attacks with references to coconut oil in their hair. 

Other Indian participants discuss being targeted with labels of dirt for body hair and color of skin. References to "Indian snakes" similarly are used to depict Indians. Follow social media interactions and you will witness the circulation of this label to denigrate Indians.

The racist behaviors of Chinese Singaporeans are multiplied many times in interactions with low-wage migrant workers in Singapore. Throughout our fieldwork that spans over a decade, our research team documents racist abuses that migrant construction workers and foreign domestic workers are subjected to in Singapore.

The desire for Whiteness forms the basis of the infrastructure of Chinese racism directed at South Asians. This desire for Whiteness is evident across discursive spaces and sites, projecting the superiority of the White skin. Brown/Black/Coloured skin are attached to dirt in majority Chinese discursive spaces.

The authoritarian contexts of many East Asian nations further limit the needed conversations on Chinese racism, often labeling articulations that point out Chinese racism as racially insensitive or threatening to racial harmony. For instance, Indian bloggers and performers have been targeted by the Singapore state for calling out the racism in public and media discourse. Most recently, media performer Preeti Nair was taken to task for calling out the racism of a "brown face" ad run by a state-sponsored corporation on state-sponsored media.

Consider in this backdrop the articulations of racism voiced by Chinese about Western portrayals of Chinese culinary practices as "dirty" amid outbreaks such as SARS and Corona virus. 

That the origins of the Wuhan virus can be tracked to the live animal markets of China becomes the basis for tactics of labeling, quarantining, and boundary-making in the West. These arguments about Western racism get taken up uncritically by White liberals, pointing to the racist nature of the Western portayals of Chinese. (These White liberal woke-sounding statements are themselves often racist, referring to treatments of Asians and sub-suming the intricacies, power and politics of differences within Asia).

The narratives of White racism then form the basis of Chinese advocacy in White societies. These Chinese articulations of White xenophobia and racism need to be situated in the backdrop of Chinese racism toward South Asians, Africans, and people of colour. 

Conversations on White racism toward Chinese using the stigmatizing label of dirt need to be situated amid critical interrogation of the Chinese desire for Whiteness. 

This Chinese desire for Whiteness forms the basis of Chinese racism directed at South Asians and Africans, often circulating the narrative of "dirt" that forms a key resource for racist constructions. Whiteness travels in the interstices of Asia and across Asia, in the racist labels used by Whiteness-aspiring Chinese across Asia often to mistreat other dark-skinned races from across Asia.

How often for instance do Chinese cultural constructions circulate the narrative of the dirty South Asian? How often do Chinese cultural constructions reify racist logics of Whiteness, all the while subjecting South Asians to xenophobia and racism? 

Decolonizing racism is an invitation to look closely at the layers through which Whiteness circulates, ultimately holding up White hegemony and cultural categories of White superiority. The label of "dirt" that forms the infrastructure of racism must be decolonized across borders and spaces. 

The mobility of Whiteness and the apparati of desire connected with it must be dismantled.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...