Skip to main content

Stigma and the politics of labels: Decolonizing racism


One of the strongest emergent themes in our fieldwork on experiences of racism in Singapore is the use of the "dirty Indian" label that is thrown at Indians by members of the Chinese majority in Singapore. 

Participants in our fieldwork often describe experiences of being harassed with labels associated with dirt. These experiences of being labeled as dirty span the lifecourse, from childhood to schools and the university to workplaces to community interactions to media portrayals to interactions on social media. 

Brown skin colour is equated with dirt in the hegemonic Chinese construction in Singapore, and in many other Chinese majority countries across East and Southeast Asia. 

The term "smelly apu nene" for instance gets used by members of the Chinese majority culture as a tool for discriminating against Indians, often in playgrounds, at other times in classrooms, and yet at other times in workplaces. 

Indian women discuss experiences of being targets of racist attacks with references to coconut oil in their hair. 

Other Indian participants discuss being targeted with labels of dirt for body hair and color of skin. References to "Indian snakes" similarly are used to depict Indians. Follow social media interactions and you will witness the circulation of this label to denigrate Indians.

The racist behaviors of Chinese Singaporeans are multiplied many times in interactions with low-wage migrant workers in Singapore. Throughout our fieldwork that spans over a decade, our research team documents racist abuses that migrant construction workers and foreign domestic workers are subjected to in Singapore.

The desire for Whiteness forms the basis of the infrastructure of Chinese racism directed at South Asians. This desire for Whiteness is evident across discursive spaces and sites, projecting the superiority of the White skin. Brown/Black/Coloured skin are attached to dirt in majority Chinese discursive spaces.

The authoritarian contexts of many East Asian nations further limit the needed conversations on Chinese racism, often labeling articulations that point out Chinese racism as racially insensitive or threatening to racial harmony. For instance, Indian bloggers and performers have been targeted by the Singapore state for calling out the racism in public and media discourse. Most recently, media performer Preeti Nair was taken to task for calling out the racism of a "brown face" ad run by a state-sponsored corporation on state-sponsored media.

Consider in this backdrop the articulations of racism voiced by Chinese about Western portrayals of Chinese culinary practices as "dirty" amid outbreaks such as SARS and Corona virus. 

That the origins of the Wuhan virus can be tracked to the live animal markets of China becomes the basis for tactics of labeling, quarantining, and boundary-making in the West. These arguments about Western racism get taken up uncritically by White liberals, pointing to the racist nature of the Western portayals of Chinese. (These White liberal woke-sounding statements are themselves often racist, referring to treatments of Asians and sub-suming the intricacies, power and politics of differences within Asia).

The narratives of White racism then form the basis of Chinese advocacy in White societies. These Chinese articulations of White xenophobia and racism need to be situated in the backdrop of Chinese racism toward South Asians, Africans, and people of colour. 

Conversations on White racism toward Chinese using the stigmatizing label of dirt need to be situated amid critical interrogation of the Chinese desire for Whiteness. 

This Chinese desire for Whiteness forms the basis of Chinese racism directed at South Asians and Africans, often circulating the narrative of "dirt" that forms a key resource for racist constructions. Whiteness travels in the interstices of Asia and across Asia, in the racist labels used by Whiteness-aspiring Chinese across Asia often to mistreat other dark-skinned races from across Asia.

How often for instance do Chinese cultural constructions circulate the narrative of the dirty South Asian? How often do Chinese cultural constructions reify racist logics of Whiteness, all the while subjecting South Asians to xenophobia and racism? 

Decolonizing racism is an invitation to look closely at the layers through which Whiteness circulates, ultimately holding up White hegemony and cultural categories of White superiority. The label of "dirt" that forms the infrastructure of racism must be decolonized across borders and spaces. 

The mobility of Whiteness and the apparati of desire connected with it must be dismantled.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri