Skip to main content

The immorality of reputational economies and totalitarian control



Totalitarian control thrives on the totality of power over every space of articulation. In turn, totalitarian control is intrinsic to the reproduction of absolute power.

Power works through every corner of totalitarian societies, from the schools and universities in such societies, to work spaces, to neighborhoods, to homes.

The effect of power is felt at the cellular level, in the everyday being of life in the regime.

Totalitarian control is exercised not only through direct tools of repression, but also through various everyday norms that constitute interactions.

One such form of normative control exercised in totalitarian systems is in the threat to reputation. The threat to reputation works to keep intact the practices of the regime, without questions or criticisms.

Any criticism of the system and/or its corrupt processes can be controlled by attacking the reputation of the person raising the criticism. Such forms of attacks on reputation can work powerfully to silence academics, activists, and opposition politicians.

The sophistication of the attacks lies in their ability to erase opposition without the need for resorting to overt repressive tactics. A voice of dissent is systematically destroyed through the manufactured discourses that are disseminated.

Amid global connectivity, articulations of human rights, and pressures on totalitarian regimes, regimes have increasingly turned to forms of reputational attacks.  Totalitarian regimes of the twenty first century therefore are also often reputational economies, having developed various forms of strategies for attacking the reputation of critics that challenge the hegemonic control of the regime. Attacks on reputation can take a wide variety of forms, from direct attacks to insinuations to planting uncertainty about a dissentor.

Across institutions, organizations, and neighborhoods of totalitarian regimes, regime workers are planted to hold up the reputational economy. Communicative inversions are cooked up and disseminated systematically to keep intact the power of the regime. The subjects of the regime are given the message, "you will pay a high price with your reputation if you don't keep in line. Collaborate with the regime and you will be handsomely rewarded, Even better, become an accomplice of the regime, and you will climb to the very top." The regime maintains this reputational order by placing its accomplices at the head of institutions, organizations, communities, and neighborhoods.

In the web of reputational networks, one is made to believe that challenging the regime is futile.

What then are the possibilities of resistance to the reputational economies that form the infrastructures of totalitarian control? These possibilities perhaps lie first and foremost in making visible the immorality of the reputational economy and by refusing to participate in it. The refusal to participate in the reputational economy renders powerless the totalitarian tools of reputation management. To the extent that I don't give a f$$$ about how you attack my reputation, I am not subject to the workings of reputational power. When enough number of people stop giving a f$$$, the power of the reputational regime disintegrates. Forming collectives that together challenge the reputational logics and render visible their oppressive logics forms the basis of dismantling totalitarianism.

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...

Upper caste Indian women in the diaspora, DEI, and the politics of hate

Figure 1: Trump, Vance and their partners responding to the remarks by Mariann Edgar Budde   Emergent from the struggles of the civil rights movement , led by African Americans , organized against the oppressive history of settler colonialism and slavery that forms the backbone of US society, structures around diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) formed an integral role in forging spaces for diverse recognition and representation.  These struggles around affirmative action, diversity, equity and inclusion were at the heart of the changes to white only immigration policies, building pathways for migration of diverse peoples from the Global South.  The changes to the immigration policies created opportunities for Indians to migrate to the US, with a rise of Indian immigration into the US since the 1970s into educational institutions, research and development infrastructures, and technology-finance infrastructures. These migratory structures into the US were leveraged by l...

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit...