Skip to main content

Power and vacuous communication


Vacuous communication is communication that is empty, gutted of materiality, located in networks of symbolic references that are equally empty. Through these interpenetrating chains of vacuous symbols, power finds strategies of retaining and ensconcing itself.

Vacuous communication is an essential communicative strategy of hegemonic structures.  The various combinations of otherwise disconnected words make up the formations that serve the agendas of power.

In digital networks, the vacuous formations travel quickly from the elite structures of authoritarian regimes to think tanks propped up by such regimes, to the academic-business thought leadership panels of the 1% in the picturesque meeting rooms of the Swiss Alps.

Vacuous communication thrives on word play. Wordsmiths, particularly credentialed academic experts, are integral to building infrastructures of vacuous communication.

Vacuous communication is often a collection of words.

Words that are arranged in meaningless threads with the appearance of complexity. The greater the impermeability of the mesh of words, the greater their ability to put up the wall that renders invisible the oppressions, corruption, and unethical practices of the regime. Regimes therefore have particular penchant for charlatans that will happily cook up word mixes, delivered in neatly packaged postmodern tropes, seeding doubt on the regime's strategies and simultaneously attaching the regime to aspirational concoctions.

Diplomats, academics, paper pushers, all categories of charlatans are actively recruited into think tanks and knowledge hubs to cook up the right word mixes. Appropriate financial incentives are paid for doing this dirty work.

Vacuous communication, for instance, creates frameworks and knowledge claims for seeing a totalitarian regime as a futuristic model of governance. It does so by creating and circulating representations that reject the effects of totalitarian control. How do you generate these representations?

Here is the usual recipe for creating vacuous communication:

Produce word mixes that mean nothing but sound good, collected from aspirational words (efficiency, economic transparency, participation), plant them, and then circulate them to create a mirage that obfuscates the corruption of power, particularly totalitarian power. The effervescent curtain on which the empty images are projected props up a wall, rendering invisible the techniques of totalitarian oppression and erasure. Words are first removed from their material anchors; this process of unsettling words is critical to the discursive work of power. Financial misappropriations, mis-spendings, bribery, and conflicts of interest get strategically obfuscated under the empty word mixes that mean nothing. Elaborate performances of targeting dissent are framed as transparency. These meaningless word mixes work well to distract and divert attention from the workings of totalitarian power. Through word mixes, the most corrupt of regimes can appear as the most "clean." Techniques of corruption can be written in as means of "clean governance." Techniques of circulating corruption money can be written up as "business efficiency" or "ease of business."

Similarly, consider the various versions of the term participation and how it gets thrown around. "Participation" is deployed by the worst of totalitarian regimes that seek to silence democratic participation through a variety of techniques. Incorporated into word plays, mixed in with terms such as "e," "engagement," "digital," and so on, participation turns into a vacuous word, one that means nothing and is not attached to materiality. To perform communicative inversion, the complete reversal of materiality (such as a totalitarian regime selling itself as the elixir of democracy), words need to be first emptied of the materialities tied to them. Emptying the word participation of the materiality of participation enables the regime to project itself as democratic and participatory.

Vacuous communication is a basic strategy one witnesses throughout the corridors of power, from think tanks to planning summits to global conferences on sustainable futures. Interrogating the production of vacuous communication is integral to the process of social change.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...