Skip to main content

"From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free": The right of colonized peoples to voice calls for freedom



On November 26, 2018, my colleague Professor Marc Lamont Hill, Steve Charles Professor of Media, Cities, and Solutions in Temple’s Klein College of Media and Communications, delivered a speech to the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People at the United Nations Day of Solidarity.

In his powerful speech, Professor Hill offered an impassioned call for solidarity between people of color, drawing out a vision for anti-racist solidarity. 


The speech made by Professor Hill is an excellent exemplar of principled communication scholarship that reaches out to the call for social justice. 

In his speech, Professor Hill calls out Israeli state-sponsored atrocities and the ways in which these atrocities have systematically oppressed, colonized, and threatened the Palestinian people. He categorically outlines the violence, racism, and torture carried out routinely by Israel on Palestinians.

At the end of the speech, Professor Hill invoked the rights of the Palestinian people, noting ““We have an opportunity to not just offer solidarity in words but to commit to political action, grass-roots action, local action and international action that will give us what justice requires and that is a free Palestine from the river to the sea.”  

For his reference "from the river to the sea," Professor Marc Lamont Hill was targeted by the Israeli lobby, with the right wing media playing up the attack on him, quickly moving to label him an anti-Semite. Patrick O’Connor, chairman of Temple University’s Board of Trustees, at Temple University , called for his firing. Mr. O’Connor labeled the statement by Professor Hill “lamentable” and “disgusting.” He told the Philadelphia Enquirer that had Hill worked for a private institution, he and others would have moved to “fire him immediately.” He also noted that he had instructed “Temple's legal staff to explore its options in response to Hill's remarks.” 

In the wake of this attack on a colleague's academic freedom, I tweeted about the fundamental right of a colonized peoples to call for an end to the colonization. This right, protected by the United Nations resolution on decolonization in 1960s, reflects the right of colonized peoples to demand freedom. It states:

"All peoples have the right to self-determination; by virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development."

This right to freedom is fundamentally tied to the right to voice in the culture-centered approach (CCA). In the CCA, colonialism is a fundamental threat to health and wellbeing, erasing the voices of the colonized in articulating claims to freedom. For making this theoreticaly informed claim that is intertwined with an active imagination of a practice of decolonization, the Israel lobby in New Zealand started targeting me, tweeting my employer and the Vice Chancellor, conveniently labeling me an anti-semite.

Having consistently fought over the years alongside colleagues who have been targeted by the lobby for exposing Israeli atrocities, I am all too familiar with the tactics used by Zionists. Most often, they hide behind the face of organizations as they throw out the label. Equating any critique of Israel with anti-semitism, the lobby works precisely through the silencing of voice. The paradox of Israeli democracy is its incorporation of violence and erasure as techniques of everyday management.

The fight for voice of the colonized so the colonized could articulate her desires for freedom is one of the most important struggles of our times. That Palestinian people have the right to call for ending the colonial occupation forms the fundamental basis for culturally centering health and wellbeing. To culturally center is at its heart to build communicative infrastructures for voices of decolonization.





Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...
Read more

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...
Read more

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...
Read more