Skip to main content

"She is just being strict:" The code for perpetuating abuse



"Being strict" if often a code for abuse in academia.

"Being strict" produces and enables cultures of abuse by legitimizing abusive faculty behaviors.

The guise of "being strict" justifies faculty behaviors that target students, making them acceptable, almost desirable to the university, as behaviors that protect and uphold the standards of academe.

Moreover, "she is only being strict" is often the justification that enablers of abuse in faculty cultures use to support perpetrators of abuse, while at the same time retaining their pretend-radical, privileged positions as so-called voices of societal conscience.

I can turn the other way and not say anything about ongoing abuse in my department as long as I can tell myself "Oh, she is just being strict."

Imagine a Full Professor that systematically abuses graduate students, berating them publicly, going off in a fit of rage without any reason and attacking their competence. The mode of attack used by the Professor is that the quality of the work produced by the students is not up to the mark.

Imagine a Full Professor that makes her post-doctoral fellows (fresh out of Ph.D.) write her grant applications, without guiding them through how to write these applications, and then berating them publicly for being "stupid."

Imagine a Graduate Studies Director who randomly makes up new rules, telling a woman student of color that her dissertation examination committee needs to have committee members who are not friends with her advisor. When pushed to show where these rules are written, she says "I am upholding the standards." When asked "What do you mean by friends?," she states, "Oh, your advisor and the examiner should not have said Hi to each other at conferences etc., or would never have met before."

Imagine a Head of Department who states to a graduate student submitting her dissertation that her dissertation draft first needs to be approved by the Head before it is goes out for review. When asked by the student where this is stated in policy, the Head notes "I am protecting the standards of the department." The Head further notes, "I need three months before the University deadline for submissions to read the dissertation" (shared 10 days before the submission deadline).

In academic cultures, the language of standards is often precisely the language of  abuse.

Ironically, what makes the abuse gain legitimacy is the very language of standards set in the backdrop of ever-shifting goalposts. The standards are never really clear, and it is equally unclear when the sword of standards will come down, and on whom. The effect of abuse is precisely in the guessing game, with graduate students performing their best disciplined behavior, in the hope that the sword will not fall on them the next time.

"Being strict" becomes the excuse for perpetuating abusive behaviors.

That the measures of "strictness" are applied randomly, without any basis in written codes of governance, and without precedence, gives power to the abuse and exaggerates its oppressiveness. 

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...
Read more

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...
Read more

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...
Read more