Skip to main content

The challenge with cultures of academic plagiarism in Asian universities



The problem of academic dishonesty is a key challenge in many rankings-chasing Asian universities.

Practices of stealing works of students and junior colleagues are often embedded in power hierarchies of Asian cultures, where the culture of stealing is normalized into notions of academic position.

Consider for instance a full professor that owns a laboratory and critical equipment infrastructure in the laboratory. He then expects every Assistant Professor using the equipment to include him as an author.

Consider another instance of an Associate Professor in Quantum Physics collaborating on a project with an Assistant Professor [based on an idea developed by the Assistant Professor] take the key ideas framing the project and apply them to a different context to publish a first-authored journal article where she claims ownership of the key ideas.

Consider another instance of an Assistant Professor in Biomedicine working on a collaborative grant with a Full Professor and doing most of the writing. The Full Professor then takes those ideas and publishes a paper with his graduate students, without including the Assistant Professor and without attributing the ideas to the Assistant Professor. It turns out much of what the Assistant Professor wrote found its way into the paper.

Consider an Associate Professor in Public Health plagiarizing the work of a collaborator on a grant to publish a paper on the basis of the collaborator's work without citing the collaborator. Now consider that the same Associate Professor including the Assistant Deans and Dean of the College on the plagiarized paper.

Consider a Dean of Humanities including himself as a co-author on a plagiarized paper.

Consider an Associate Professor applying for a grant based on the thesis of a student without citing the thesis or referring to the work of the student.

Consider a Director of Research included as a co-author on a series of publications where the data were doctored up. When the Director of Research is pressed for a response, she states that she did not have anything to do with the papers (although listed as a co-author). This Director is also ironically in-charge of implementing research ethics at the University.

Consider a Professor of Digital Cultures plagiarizing the work of her doctoral student, even as she fails the doctoral student in her dissertation.

These behaviors of stealing are often normalized in Asian cultures because of Asian norms of academic relationships that are steeped in power inequalities and power hierarchies. Stealing from a junior academic is legitimized as an opportunity for the junior academic to pay her/his dues.

Asian professors often feel emboldened to exploit junior colleagues and graduate students because power inequities are normalized in academic relationships, with cultural expectations of power defining the terrains of the relationship.

The cultures of Asian hierarchy translate into students and Assistant Professors often having no access to structures for reporting an incidence of plagiarism.

Tight knit Asian cultures often come together around power to protect power; this translates into Deans, Vice Provosts and the Provost often working together to protect each other and protect another of their senior colleagues.

Reputation and image must be protected and face must be saved; abusive behaviors of senior faculty are protected under the norms of face-saving.

Structures of research ethics and integrity don't mean much as powerful university managers and Professors close in on rank to protect one of their own.

Situated at the bottom of the power hierarchy, students and Assistant Professors are often left without any accessible channels for justice. If a student complains, she is made to pay the price for having broken the unstated normative code of power. Consider the number of instances of doctoral students who had to quit their dissertation work mid-way because they complained about the dissertation advisor stealing their work. Consider MA students being denied their degree for questioning the University. Consider students being threatened by University managers to withdraw their complaint if they would like to receive their degree.

The abuse of Assistant Professors and students is exacerbated by the rankings games that push Professors to place their work in globally recognized journals.

As Asian universities climb in global rankings, their research practices ought to be held accountable to global standards of research ethics. Global professional bodies ought to do more detailed work of evaluation to hold Asian universities accountable.

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...