Skip to main content

The challenge with cultures of academic plagiarism in Asian universities



The problem of academic dishonesty is a key challenge in many rankings-chasing Asian universities.

Practices of stealing works of students and junior colleagues are often embedded in power hierarchies of Asian cultures, where the culture of stealing is normalized into notions of academic position.

Consider for instance a full professor that owns a laboratory and critical equipment infrastructure in the laboratory. He then expects every Assistant Professor using the equipment to include him as an author.

Consider another instance of an Associate Professor in Quantum Physics collaborating on a project with an Assistant Professor [based on an idea developed by the Assistant Professor] take the key ideas framing the project and apply them to a different context to publish a first-authored journal article where she claims ownership of the key ideas.

Consider another instance of an Assistant Professor in Biomedicine working on a collaborative grant with a Full Professor and doing most of the writing. The Full Professor then takes those ideas and publishes a paper with his graduate students, without including the Assistant Professor and without attributing the ideas to the Assistant Professor. It turns out much of what the Assistant Professor wrote found its way into the paper.

Consider an Associate Professor in Public Health plagiarizing the work of a collaborator on a grant to publish a paper on the basis of the collaborator's work without citing the collaborator. Now consider that the same Associate Professor including the Assistant Deans and Dean of the College on the plagiarized paper.

Consider a Dean of Humanities including himself as a co-author on a plagiarized paper.

Consider an Associate Professor applying for a grant based on the thesis of a student without citing the thesis or referring to the work of the student.

Consider a Director of Research included as a co-author on a series of publications where the data were doctored up. When the Director of Research is pressed for a response, she states that she did not have anything to do with the papers (although listed as a co-author). This Director is also ironically in-charge of implementing research ethics at the University.

Consider a Professor of Digital Cultures plagiarizing the work of her doctoral student, even as she fails the doctoral student in her dissertation.

These behaviors of stealing are often normalized in Asian cultures because of Asian norms of academic relationships that are steeped in power inequalities and power hierarchies. Stealing from a junior academic is legitimized as an opportunity for the junior academic to pay her/his dues.

Asian professors often feel emboldened to exploit junior colleagues and graduate students because power inequities are normalized in academic relationships, with cultural expectations of power defining the terrains of the relationship.

The cultures of Asian hierarchy translate into students and Assistant Professors often having no access to structures for reporting an incidence of plagiarism.

Tight knit Asian cultures often come together around power to protect power; this translates into Deans, Vice Provosts and the Provost often working together to protect each other and protect another of their senior colleagues.

Reputation and image must be protected and face must be saved; abusive behaviors of senior faculty are protected under the norms of face-saving.

Structures of research ethics and integrity don't mean much as powerful university managers and Professors close in on rank to protect one of their own.

Situated at the bottom of the power hierarchy, students and Assistant Professors are often left without any accessible channels for justice. If a student complains, she is made to pay the price for having broken the unstated normative code of power. Consider the number of instances of doctoral students who had to quit their dissertation work mid-way because they complained about the dissertation advisor stealing their work. Consider MA students being denied their degree for questioning the University. Consider students being threatened by University managers to withdraw their complaint if they would like to receive their degree.

The abuse of Assistant Professors and students is exacerbated by the rankings games that push Professors to place their work in globally recognized journals.

As Asian universities climb in global rankings, their research practices ought to be held accountable to global standards of research ethics. Global professional bodies ought to do more detailed work of evaluation to hold Asian universities accountable.

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...