Skip to main content

Forwarding facebook posts: Cultures of mistrust



Professor Reshmi Dutt-Ballerstadt is a Professor of postcolonial literature and theory, feminist theory and creative writing at Linfield College. Reshmi is a vocal critic of the cultures of Whiteness in academia and the ways in which the norms of civility held up by Whiteness erase possibilities of articulation from the gendered, raced, classed margins.

I came to know Reshmi and learn about her work when my mentor and cousin Professor Shampa Biswas, the Paul Garrett Professor of Politics at Whitman College and a scholar of postcolonial nuclear politics introduced us to each other because of our mutual interests in critically interrogating civility norms. Reshmi was editing a collection on academics being targeted with the civility regime and I contributed a chapter to her collection on the weaponization of the incivility trope to maintain raced colonial hegemony.

Reshmi has been a vocal presence in academe in theorizing the academe, interrogating the habits of the university that are steeped in Whiteness. Because of her vocal criticism of Whiteness, she has been systematically targeted by the regimes of White privilege at Linfield and outside.

As she experienced her struggles at Linfield and fought back, Professor Dutt-Ballerstadt accounted the repressive strategies deployed by the University on Facebook. What follows is a chilling account of how a facebook snitch forwarded her Facebook posts to the University administrators.

I have myself been targeted with this behavior and so have many other faculty.

Reshmi's letter to the faculty assembly at Linfield brings to the fore how the culture of facebook snitches is toxic to the very idea of the University.

"So here is the email that I wrote to our faculty assembly today. Many of my colleagues are quite disgusted as they should be that this has happened.

Dear Colleagues,

I am writing this email to you not as a member of the Faculty Executive Council or the chair of the Arts and the Humanities division, but as a fellow faculty member. I was informed yesterday by my attorney that someone took a screen shot of one of my Facebook postings (where I was critical of our administration) and forwarded it to our administration. I have also been informed that our college administration is not pleased about my said posting. I have informed our college President about my concerns and he has directed me to follow procedure if legal or ethical standard has been breached. I find these round about manner of addressing issues not productive. If anybody, administration should know who took a screen shot of my FB posting and turned it to them.

Irrespective of whether administration is pleased or not, I find such veiled threats disturbing during a time when many of us have a variety of opinions and perceptions about our administration -- both within our college and at a national level (positive, negative, critical, neutral) based on our various affiliations. Such veiled threats (that my postings are setting a wrong tone with administration) are a form of tone policing, silencing and censorship of what we can or cannot say on our own personal social media platforms like the Facebook. Such messages are particularly damaging to the rights of our more vulnerable and untenured faculty, underrepresented faculty, women and other faculty that are not afraid to speak up on their own social media platforms.

Whether administration is pleased or not about what we say on our own Facebook pages is beside the point. I am concerned that my social media account, and perhaps other accounts of our colleagues are being monitored by "friends" lurking on our pages and then reporting them to our administration. It is undisputable that this is what happened in my case. I have now heard from staff that have left Linfield that their Facebook accounts were being monitored too. Disappointing to say the least. While I am less interested in knowing who has the time or energy to monitor my social media account, or those of others (who are more vocal faculty members) I do find such acts to be "hostile" -- serving as a veiled threat to silence me and others who are critical of our administration. Such acts of reporting to our administration our activities on Facebook can and does have a chilling effect on both free speech, our faculty right to be critical of our administration, and extramural speech for faculty.

Our faculty use their personal Facebook page or other social media platforms for a variety of reasons -- social, personal or political. Also, many faculty colleagues comment on each other's posts. I do not believe we owe any explanation to our administration, or a justification for what we post on our personal FB page, nor should we tolerate methods of surveillance via screen shots to be taken and then these screenshots funneled to administration. If such acts are being carried out by administrators themselves, then this is even more concerning.

Finally, I believe strongly that it is NOT in our best interest to have our social media accounts be monitored for the reasons stated above. Furthermore, given that our institution faces a dire financial crisis, administrative time and resources ought to be spent in our enrollment and recruitment efforts and not monitoring faculty Facebook pages.

In the meantime, it may be useful for faculty who are not familiar to familiarize themselves with AAUP policies on extramural speech. I am enclosing a few articles that may be worth reading, if you are inclined. The one attached is an FAQ for "Faculty in the Wake of the 2016 Election."

Here is another one on civility:
https://www.aaup.org/issues/civility

This article is particularly on "Social Media Harassment Targets Academics of Color" from Diverse Issues in Higher Education.
https://diverseeducation.com/article/100806/

Here is a blog post that talks more specifically about Facebook screen shots and captures:
https://culture-centered.blogspot.com/…/strategies-of-autho…

I suggest that our Dean of Faculty, create an archive where more of these articles about social media and faculty rights and protections can be archived and faculty have access to it.
  
Thank you for your time. I have nothing more to say beyond being deeply disappointed.

Best,

 Reshmi"

Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...
Read more