Skip to main content

Migration, refugees, and everyday conversations: Contradictions in yuppy dreams

Neha works for one of those offshore software production farms in one of those many cyberhubs that have sprung up in Shining India.

With a not so spectacular career, a degree from a C grade engineering college where her father donated Rupees 60 lakhs to get her in, the software job has been Neha's window into the world of opportunities that awaits the new India, with promises of economic growth, development, and global leadership.

Neha does not mind the late night shifts.

After all,  she works for an American employer and gets to interact with Americans. She likes the put on accent. She also enjoys the economic freedom. She can go mall hopping, eat at trendy places, check out one of the many discs, take vacations abroad.

All of this is made possible because of the deliverables of economic growth.

As Neha considers her career trajectory ahead of her, she thinks of earning an MBA from a US university. It is at this juncture I meet Neha.

The Indian elections are coming up and we get to talking about society, politics, and economics.

She shares with me how she is going to vote for a politics of change. India needs the right candidate to clean up the country.

She shares that a major part of the cleaning up has to do with tightening the porous borders of India and sending all the Bangladeshi Muslims who have been inundating the country back to Bangladesh.

She sees these "thugs" as threats to the country, its everyday functioning, and to progress. She reminds me that there are too many Muslims that have come in because of vote bank politics and they simply have no business being in India.

I ask Neha, "What makes you uncomfortable?"

She responds, "It's all these Muslims you know."

I ask, "What about these Muslims?"

Neha, "They are a threat to everything. They steal, they cheat, they rape. They make up all the problems of India."

A few conversation turns later, I ask Neha about her choice to apply to the US for a graduate degree and ask what she hopes to achieve after earning the degree.

With a glimmer of confidence, she shares that some day she wants to be a business leader in a US company.

I ask, "What if Americans look at you the same way you look at Bangladeshi Muslims?"

Neha responds quickly, "But I am not the same. I have earned my degree. I am going to give something back to the US. I am a professional."

I really don't want to burst her bubble of a dream of an American future, and I say to myself "But for many Americans, you are just like the Bangladeshi immigrant, a threat, a drain on resources, the other. Of course, there are plenty of other Americans who are working everyday on issues of immigration so people like you and I have an opportunity to participate in the US as workers."

I ask, "What are you going to give back to the US?" "For many Americans, you are simply taking their jobs." "Even more, for many Americans, your and my professional class, our origin, and our aspirations are reflected in the criminal behaviours of the Rajat Guptas and Devyani Khobragades, inherently corrupt and unethical."

Now Neha appears confused.

She shares she has never really thought of herself this way. She has never really thought that she, a hardworking professional, has anything in common with the Bangladeshi illegal immigrants she is critical of.

Wrapping up our conversation, I share with Neha stories from my own fieldwork, stories of hard labour shared by many Bangladeshi immigrant workers who have conversed with me. Stories of struggles simply to make a living and to support their families back home. Stories that are more similar to my story than different.

I share with Neha, "for many of the men I have conversed with, they work many times harder than you and I."

Unfortunately, Neha's story is the story of many middle class children of "Shining India." The hatred for the "other" nurtured by a Facebook-savvy campaign continually directed at circulating paranoia thrives on the power of discourse to obfuscate contradictions, to render common sense inherent inconsistencies, and to write over the hypocrisies of the aspiring yuppy class.

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...