Skip to main content

What does the West have to do with it? An anticolonial read from the post!


So I am not an Indian if I am critical of Modi and his version  of Hindutva as a form of governance. I am told I have too long been a subject to the propaganda machinery of the West.

It must be all the years of US brainwashing and all the US media I have consumed.

My familiarity with India, my Indian roots, and my connections with these roots I so deeply cherish easily become subjects of questioning when I express my anxieties about the discursive space in India that is increasingly becoming constrained by the Hindutva camp. 

The West is framed as being in opposition to the imaginations of a bold India that is set to launch on a bold trajectory of Modi growth, led by the bold leadership of Mr. Narendra Modi. There is limited or no room for critique. 

Critique is seen as being reflective of a desire for the West (I am assuming as opposed to some Hinduized fetish of India).

This framing of theWest versus India, although pretty powerful in its appeal to the decolonizing trope, is almost entirely based on rhetorical frames that are themselves being manufactured and cycled by strong PR and lobbying machineries themselves located in the West.

To me what is striking about these allegations of the West versus India is the simplistic but important denial of the very West-driven communication machine that is carefully orchestrating the public relations campaign of Mr. Modi. The US-based public relations and lobbying firm APCO has done similar public relations exercises for Israel, for the Sani Abacha dictatorship in Nigeria as it prepared for the execution of nine pro-democracy activists in the mid-1990s and for "corrupt Caspian regimes" such as Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan.

APCO is also the communication outfit for major players in the US financial industry in the post-financial crisis environment, with clients such as JPMorgan Chase & Co and Citigroup Inc. The foundation of APCO is rooted in Western imagination of communication as an instrument of power and control.

APCO has been instrumental in orchestrating the "Vibrant Gujarat" events that are showcased as signs of investor confidence in the Modi governance model. With performances of investor confidence in the Modi leadership and commitments to investment in the state, the "Vibrant Gujarat" public relations campaign has been essential to the selling of Mr. Modi's image as the messiah of development, quite contrary to the actual data on development indicators that raise significant questions about the tall claims of the Gujarat development model. (http://www.vibrantgujarat.com)


The confluence of Modi and APCO is depictive of a wider collaboration of the Hindutva model of growth and development with the Western moderl of consolidating power in the hands of the nexus of local-global capitalist elite. If there is one thing that is salient about the Modi model of development, it is this: the model is as much a replica of the Western model of growth-driven development as it is a product of the communicative frames that are circulated around the model.

Much like the gap between the Western model of development that marries development to a blind faith in growth, industrialization, and consolidation of corporate power, the Modi model of development is narrowly conceived as a strategy for the consolidation of resources in the hands of the Indian elite. The development indicators of Gujarat on mortality, health, and access to basic resources debunk the growth-driven development story, and urge us to consider carefully alternative stories that sit outside the dominant Gujarat development frame circulated by the Western PR outfit APCO.

In sum, the claims of Hindutva, Indianness, and opposition to the West are convenient heuristics for the Hindu right to disseminate the deeply Western capitalist model of growth grounded in a narrowly neoliberal imagination of development. To really start interrogating the Western imaginations of development and to foster spaces for alternatives, one perhaps needs to look at the various local models of participatory governance that one witnesses across India, in opposition to the PR-machine driven model of development that is bent on selling Modi as the messiah of development.

For the Modi lovers to recognize this of course would mean that they would have to step out of the APCO generated propaganda that sells hook line and sinker a narrowly Western frame of development, albeit refashioned as some nonsensical version of Hindutva that sounds good in rhetoric but is empty in its tall claims.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri