Skip to main content

Neoliberalism Hindu Style: Nationhood reimagined

I am struck by the adulatory remarks in the major news outlets in India celebrating Bal Thackeray, remarking upon his sense of humor, his penchant for art and poetry, and his role as a political leader that united Maharashtra and gave a sense of national identity for its citizens.

These adulations are completely uncritical, rewriting the story of a leader who often referred to Hindu sentiments to inspire violence and hatred.

From watching and hearing all the praises, you would not know that this is the very demagogue who had inspired a generation of Hindu right wing fanatics, writing the script of a Maratha Hindu state.

You would not know that inspired by Hitler, this was the leader who appealed to the politics of Hindu identity to call for massacres, erasures, and mass scale violence.

What becomes most apparent in the storying of Mr. Thackeray's legacy is the fundamental paradox of neoliberal organizing of India.

This is the essential paradox between a penchant for a narrative of modernity and the affinities for right wing essentialism.

The writers of the story of a cosmopolitan India are unapologetically adulatory of a demagogue who would inspire mass violence against the very signs of modernity that they unapologetically idolize: women going to bars, valentine day celebrations, campaigning for pink underwear etc.

Neoliberalism in India essentially thrives on its ability to accomodate these very contradictory narratives.

Mumbaikars living out a cosmpolite lifestyle, pubbing out, and having a dandy time at late night discos are also very comfortable narrativizing a valorized story of Thackeray.

Media workers who otherwise enjoy the licenses of neoliberalism feel perfectly comfortable reproducing the adulatory narrative of Thackeray because it sells.

Right wing Hindu fanaticism finds perfect peace with cosmopolitinalism of the liberalized economy.

Sexual and material liberalizing works hand-in-hand with the moral police seeking to restrain liberties of desire.

This very paradox plays out in the Mumbai (read Marathi/Gujju) imaginations of a glossy cosmopolitanism sitting atop a seething face of Hindu right-wing terror.

This is the same paradox that goes unchallenged in the everyday being of middle class Indians in a liberalized economy.

On one hand, the citizens of neoliberal India can sing praises of liberalization and development; on the other hand, they can just as easily be comfortable with the logics of right wing fascism as long as it sits comfortably with their desires of greed realized through the promise of liberalization (and most often, it does). 

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...
Read more

Upper caste Indian women in the diaspora, DEI, and the politics of hate

Figure 1: Trump, Vance and their partners responding to the remarks by Mariann Edgar Budde   Emergent from the struggles of the civil rights movement , led by African Americans , organized against the oppressive history of settler colonialism and slavery that forms the backbone of US society, structures around diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) formed an integral role in forging spaces for diverse recognition and representation.  These struggles around affirmative action, diversity, equity and inclusion were at the heart of the changes to white only immigration policies, building pathways for migration of diverse peoples from the Global South.  The changes to the immigration policies created opportunities for Indians to migrate to the US, with a rise of Indian immigration into the US since the 1970s into educational institutions, research and development infrastructures, and technology-finance infrastructures. These migratory structures into the US were leveraged by l...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit...
Read more