Skip to main content

What do you find so threatening?

So here you go. I have often been puzzled as to what it is about CCA that threatens your typical academic. Why is it that when presented with the idea of CCA that your "typical" Comm scholar often has a gut response of defensiveness? (Of course, I am using the label "typical" to refer to a specific representation of the average, the middle, the central tendency that occupies the status quo; and of course, there have been a number of Communication scholars who have opened up, encouraged, and nurtured some of the basic premises of CCA). For this blog though, I am going to refer to that central tendency or the mediocre average that responds from various positions of feeling defensive, articulating this response in various froms of pettiness and petty politics (Marx is so right on target when he refers to the bourgeoisie as "petty").

Yesterday, during our Hunger Coalition meeting, one of our community members who has herself experienced hunger summarized her understanding of this defensive response among bourgeoisie academics. She noted, "when we speak, it makes a whole bunch of people uncomfortable."

So where does this discomfort come from? Perhaps a lot from the threat of one's privilege being challenged, from the threat of being rendered irrelevant and being asked to be accountable to those who have historically been erased.

Because if in this instance, the hungry were to be able to speak in a way that matters, in a way that demonstrates that people who have been historically marginalized may know a whole lot more than those who sit around the table and pretend to know a whole lot hidden in their psychobabble, it would put many of our average academics out of jobs. It would raise questions such as "How do you justify spending valuable $ on ineffective policies, programs, interventions that continue to demonstrate small and unsustainable effect sizes?" "How do you justify manufacturing a bunch of BS and labeling that as utterly meaningless constructs that have absolutely zero relevance for those that you target?"

The prospect of those from the margins speaking is ultimately utterly terrifying because it stands to de-center us from the privileged positions we occupy. And this political economy of personal-structural profiteering (because come on, we all know that we profit tremendously with these incentives within petty bourgeoisie structures) perhaps underlies the responses of feeling threatened by prospects of voices from elsewhere speaking up in ways that de-center the priviege of the middle. In the next couple of weeks, I am going to spend my blogs in interrogating the academic structures, processes, and systems that are tied to these fundamental responses of "being threatened" among the middle.

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...

Upper caste Indian women in the diaspora, DEI, and the politics of hate

Figure 1: Trump, Vance and their partners responding to the remarks by Mariann Edgar Budde   Emergent from the struggles of the civil rights movement , led by African Americans , organized against the oppressive history of settler colonialism and slavery that forms the backbone of US society, structures around diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) formed an integral role in forging spaces for diverse recognition and representation.  These struggles around affirmative action, diversity, equity and inclusion were at the heart of the changes to white only immigration policies, building pathways for migration of diverse peoples from the Global South.  The changes to the immigration policies created opportunities for Indians to migrate to the US, with a rise of Indian immigration into the US since the 1970s into educational institutions, research and development infrastructures, and technology-finance infrastructures. These migratory structures into the US were leveraged by l...

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit...