Skip to main content

Culture and Sexuality

  This week's readings and the BLOG were a bit challenging for me in the sense, I had not thought of sexuality in this sense and understanding sexuality and relating it to the readings took me some time. Of course, culture and sexuality are related and intertwined. Culture is a meaning making enterprise and so is sexuality, the way we identify ourselves in relation to sex, gender. As a human being, your sexuality is a part of your physical, emotional, intellectual, and social self. It very much influences how we think of ourselves, how we relate to others and our meaning making process in the society. As all of us are different, there is no normative "sexuality but it is a product of the interaction of our gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, identity creation, values and persepectives (again leading towards epistemologies and the cosmology we access in the meaning making enterprise). This manifests in our expectations of how we think a man or woman should behave and these play a role in our sexuality. For example, My concept of a woman in India and in US are radically different, due to my beliefs, values, cultural dispositions and lived experience (again a result of my perceptions). The readings take these concepts to several new levels and dimensions.


Foucalt talks about power and its machinations to imprison, standardize sexuality. Amongst many examples, he talks of the architecture of the secondary schools. It was an 'aha' moment for me when I was reminded of the architecture of my school, its seating plan and the architecture of my hostel where there was a visible, tangible segregation both physical and self enforceed discipline of the living areas of the men and the women. While Foucalt is subject to intense criticism in many of his articulations, nevertheless his contention makes sense. 

The othering, the discipling becomes evident in many of the readings. In the direct and indirect sex work in Vietnam, I was taken back by the  capture-recapture method. The researchers approach the field with lots of paternalistic assumptions about the population and ignores the globalisation influences, the dynamics, the politics of sexuality. The authors are also naive when the profess that they are confident that they are able to map the hidden sex workers...a statement like this underlines lack of rigor, validity. Why use capture-recapture methods? The statement likening it to wild animals is probably the best reason!! Indeed, hidden sex workers are "wild animals". The methods leave lot to be desired and the interviews are more of surveys than really probing the issue. But methodology aside, it ignores the issues of sexuality, of expression, of relatedness, meaning making.

       The reading on crack cocaine made me very sad. I wondered how the black female crack users did really negotiate their life..family does play a larger role in it I guess!! And why is it always women who are at the receiving end. A question of sexuality? Then I researched a bit on the crack cocaine and Heroine phenomenon and was surprised that these were marketed and sold as legitimate drugs in the US by renowned companies. And how does it manifest in human lives...through the interstices of culture and sexuality and its overlaps and the way the dominant forces constitute them.

      The discourse on AIDS in the pieces are similar. AIDS means dehumanizing, stigmatizing and its the women, the "sexually deviant" who are on the receiving end...being blamed for the infection source, Racialized discourses, pathologizing discourses are rampant.  Schoepf, in describing these writes AIDS as an epidemic of signification. He quotes Reid (1992) who said that the international policmakers lacked epistemic responsibility in their neglect of gender inequality and their actions rooted in the hegemonic definitions and disciplining procedures of sexuality. As Schoepf further writes, the capture of the state by conservative forces seeking to conrol sex and pleasure. In a parallel vein Mehta writes eloquently about the distinctions and discourses situated in meanings of sexuality reifying the differences between the Musalmani (Katua) and Hindus. I remember me in college classifying whole communities as "Kuts" (diminiutive of Katua) without a reflexive thought. 

      I am looking forward to today's class to provide me more understanding and perspectives.

Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...
Read more

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...
Read more

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...
Read more