Skip to main content

Radio programs and "masturbation" as national development

What is a culturally appropriate intervention? What is a "culturally appropriate" AIDS intervention? What is a "culturally appropriate" safe motherhood intervention? How do we deal with the critique of "medicalization of sexuality" vs the "sexualization of consumption"? How do find the right path, the balance between a development - commercial - government - multilateral - private sector collaboration? Is the territory of health and sex still uncharted? 

Are all local values and meanings "cultural" and should we consider all services, methods, models to be "appropriate"? What "can" be done and what "should" be done? Assessments of "can" and "should" are bound up with views of the "culture" in question, assessments of its boundaries, its integrity, its authenticity, its very location "in" some places, some practices and some knowledges but not in others. If this is true how can "outsiders" design and implement a "culturally appropriate" intervention? Is there one way, a defined path for health interventions? Which is political and which is not? Are alternative paths the best ways? Isn't the alternative medical system/ ways to curing and healing also a product of the struggles over colonialism, nationalism, modernization and globalization? Aren't many noted votaries of "Ayurveda", "oriental medicine", "chinese medicine" etc..also politically savvy players whose articulation was more for their advancement and understanding of "science"? Why are errors of repudiation important? Do they not occur both when alternative medicines are assesseed by orthodox biomedicine and also when orthodox biomedicine is assessed by alternative medicines? 

I have had the fortune of being associated with many health campaigns and radio programs. In 2006-7, we launched a radio program on "safe motherhood" and "sexual health" targetted at adolescent and young women of Orissa. It was a hugely popular program but when examined under the critical lens, it left a lot to be desired. It used donor language, it was not participatory, the language used in many pieces were paternalistic and condescending, it created controversies, it was accused as not being "culturally sensitive", it carried advertisements of condoms, family planning messages. We offended parents, we offended government functionaries, we offended women, and we always managed to tread the thin line with the All India Radio as we were giving them the much needed revenue. The program also elicited numerous letters and queries from young women from all corners of Orissa and we tried to answer most using reputed, gynaecologists and obstretricians who were known for their erudition and "a good hand". For me reading the letters was a humbling and frustrating experience. The letters and their texts, inscribed experiences, questions told me how ineffective all our work was in relation to what all had to be done. It told me how comfortable we were in our own coccoons of knowledge and the existence of valuable lives around us whom we did not in the least impact.  Did we do the right thing by broadcasting the program, what could we have done to get the "right balance"? Should we have not entertained the questions on "masturbation" in a public program? 

What are those alternative ways of healing and knowing? When does the familiar becomes unfamiliar and the mainstream becomes alternative?

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...
Read more

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...
Read more

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...
Read more