Skip to main content

"Gapa", "Galpo", narratives...

The different narratives of a situation by the different people involved in it reminded me of a movie very close to my heart, Rashomon. As Connelly (2002) succintly puts it, the decision to retell a story will depend on the personal reasons/ motivations of the reteller. In today's world of health communication we have so many competing narratives. The search for the "real" or "right" narrative is not important but what's important is not to ignore these stories. Narratives provide us invaluable insights into a human beings life, suffering, existence, surrounding, health. In many ways it provides us a ground to move ahead, take decisions. 
In emergency response, in the first 48 hours, usually teams do not find much records or information as most records are affected and the normal information channels are in a disarray and non functional. So, the way the response team moves ahead is by collecting narratives: "so please tell us how did the flood waters come in and what were you doing then? How did you reach safety? Did you have any medicines with you?..and so on".  This narrative gives us a picture of the village/ community, some initial numbers to work on and a story to share with the larger community/ the world outside. 
Narratives help us situate ourselves, in our identity creation. As Adelson (2001) writes, they help the indigenous peope continuously negotiate their identities within the nation state. Hawkins (2002) puts forth beautifully in his fictional story and further connections with the greek play on Philocletes, the famous archer. The narratives display the ethical dilemma, the torn between choices situation for the young doctor. I assume this would be the situation in which many medical residents find themselves in the beginning of their career and lesser so as across time they make peace with the contestations and lose their reflexivity and "ethics (?)". 
Stories do matter and have a great effect. All the times, I have been to villages to interact with the community and implement some project, I will be asked to listen to a lot of problems/ stories and entertain requests of helping them. Of course, I would be careful not to give false promises and raise expectations but I will give them reassurances and promises of looking in to the matter by speaking with the responsible government functionaries. But in my heart of hearts, I know that my sheer presence there is raising expectations and they have sacrificed their valuable time to meet me for some benefit which I am not sure that I will be fulfilling.  Each day of working in the field is a ethical dilemma with no "right" or "wrong" answers. I realise that these interaction with the narratives and stories has guided me. In today's health scenario, there is no time for stories, specially in the timed world here in the US. "Time is money" and there is so much to do that one is always running behind...behind what..Time of course!!! So, is it only the anthropologist and the writer who has the time for narratives or some communication researcher who has been "funded" to work on narratives? Further, narratives are not sterile but a part of the context where the narrative is created. Taking it out of the context ensures its sterility but strips it of the meaning which is relevant to the community.
Perera (2001) scored a good point after all his pages of stories from a fractured community of Sri Lanka where every narrative is so contested that the only solace is in the present. Perera (2001) with his narratives shows that where the state, the rebels, the powerful, all prosecute, where the state, biomedicine, science, rational approaches cannot provide succor, its through narratives that the community finds healing. Its through their own constructed beliefs, stories that the mother is comforted of her son's death, the wife of her husbands' torture and of making sense of a life where everyone more powerful prosecutes/ exploits you without a reason. The narratives help the people make sense, articulate.
As communication researchers, we ought to spend more time on exploring narratives and research money as they give us access to hitherto unexplored spaces which can lead to coping and healing.

Popular posts from this blog

The whiteness of binaries that erase the Global South: On Communicative Inversions and the invitation to Vijay Prashad in Aotearoa

When I learned through my activist networks that the public intellectual Vijay Prashad was coming to Aotearoa, I was filled with joy. In my early years in the U.S., when learning the basics of the struggle against the fascist forces of Hindutva, I came in conversation with Vijay's work. Two of his critical interventions, the book, The Karma of Brown Folk , and the journal article " The protean forms of Yankee Hindutva " co-authored with Biju Matthew and published in Ethnic and Racial Studies shaped my early activism. These pieces of work are core readings in understanding the workings of Hindutva fascism and how it mobilizes cultural tropes to serve fascist agendas. Much later, I felt overjoyed learning about his West Bengal roots and his actual commitment to the politics of the Left, reflected in the organising of the Communist Party of India (Marxist), a political register that shaped much of my earliest lessons around Global South resistance, collectivization, and orga...

Libertarianism, the Free Speech Union, and the Life of Disinformation

The rise of the far-right globally is intertwined with the globally networked power of libertarian think tanks, funded at the base by the global extractive industries . In this blog post, through an analysis of the disinformation-based campaign I have personally experienced since October 2023 mobilised by the communicative ecosystem of the Free Speech Union (FSU), I will attend to the lifecycle of disinformation in libertarian networks, arguing that the disinformation ecosystem is invested in upholding both white supremacy and extractive capital. The FSU’s investment in disinformation I argue that the FSU is invested in producing and circulating disinformation. In response to my analysis of the hypocrisy of the Free Speech Union (FSU) that positions itself as a champion of free speech in Aotearoa while one of its co-founders, council members and spokespersons David Cumin (who is also one of the key actors representing Israel Institute of New Zealand) actively targets the freedom of a...

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute ...