Skip to main content

Why social justice lies at the heart of interfaith dialogues


Social justice, the articulations of justice rooted in equality, attend to the question of human dignity for all, especially for those at the margins of societies.

Amidst the global rise of the far-right and its infrastructure of hate, social justice forms the dialogic anchor for resistance. 

Given the role of religion in the attacks carried out by the far-right, interfaith dialogues are key registers for social justice. 

Through the conversational spaces created for diverse faiths, registers can be built to organize against the politics of hate. 

In these interfaith conversations, majority communities have a vital role to play in listening to the articulations of justice at the margins, in fostering the spaces for claiming human dignity, and in building infrastructures for religious freedom.

In India, the rise of the far-right Hindu nationalist forces is embodied in the mobilization for Hindu nation (Hindu rashtra). This Hindu nation is built on the monolithic imposition of Hindu sanskriti (culture) by a Hindu jati (race). 

This racist conceptual basis of Hindutva manifests in organized attacks on religious minorities, both symbolically and materially.

The mobilization of attacks on mosques  is a key feature of Hindutva. Hindutva has mobilized its political power through the symbolic and material attacks on mosques and praying spaces of Muslims. The ascendance to political power of Hindutva in the mid-1990s was organized through the attack on the Babri masjid. 



In recent months, between August and December 2021, we have witnessed multiple ongoing attacks of Hindutva goons on the praying spaces of Muslims across India. We have witnessed images including photos and videos of Hindutva armies attacking Muslims performing prayers in open spaces. These material attacks have been mobilized by Hindutva narratives suggesting Muslims are taking over public spaces.



Similar attacks have been carried out on Churches, convents, and Christmas celebrations. In the past several days, around Christmas, we have witnessed Christmas celebrations being attacked. Video narratives document Hindutva hoodlums taking over Christmas celebrations with children and shouting Hindutva slogans.


In an irony that is both comic and ominous, in a video, Hindutva groups are witnessed chanting "Down with Santa Claus" and burning effigies of Santa Claus.

To counter the violence of Hindutva targeted at religious minorities in India and in the Indian diaspora, inter-faith dialogues are urgently necessary. 

A culture-centered turn to interfaith dialogues foregrounds the voices of the margins as the basis of building the dialogues. Centering the voices of India's Muslim, Christian, Sikh, and other diverse minorities is vital to countering the hate propagated by Hindutva.

In the Indian diaspora globally, centering the voices of India's diverse religious minority communities in interfaith dialogues is a key ingredient to witnessing the oppression carried out by Hindutva, to documenting the pernicious effects of this oppression, and to countering the oppression. 

The whiteness of the dominant approaches to interfaith dialogue that see interfaith as the spaces to avoid conflicts by silencing conversations on difficult topics, is complicit in the perpetuation of violence. The erasure of the voices of Indian religious minorities in the diaspora and the centering of Hindutva voices in interfaith spaces perpetuate the grotesque violence of Hindutva in the Indian diaspora. 

The unseeing and erasure along with the platforming of Hindutva ideologues in interfaith spaces is disempowering, is an attack on the dignity of Indian minorities, and threatens the religious freedoms of minority Indian communities at the "margins of the margins" of the diaspora. 

We must organize to decolonize the whiteness of interfaith spaces to build registers for actual religious freedom at the margins. The white tastes of universality holding up dialogue as erasure are complicit in the reproduction of violence. These tastes and their affinities must be dismantled to enable the articulations of justice.

 

 

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri