Skip to main content

Why we must continue to raise our voice against aggressive Israeli settler colonialism


 

As a decolonization theorist, I find the fundamental question of Israeli settler colonialism as a guiding anchor to my theorizing work. As an exemplar of settler colonialism, the state of Israel continues to perpetuate a wide array of communicative tropes that justify its oppressive practices. 

The oppression of colonialism is communicative. It is established, legitimized, and circulated through communicative resources and architectures.

Israeli settler colonialism works through multiple communicative inversions, the turning of materiality on its head to legitimize the infrastructure of colonial violence.

The communicative infrastructure of Israeli settler colonialism marks the Palestinian people as terrorist to perpetuate its terror. 

Palestinian claims to sovereignty are labeled as terrorist to sustain the Israeli apparatuses of colonial expansion.

The marking of the colonized subject as the source of terror is a fundamental communicative inversion that sustains the colonial project. 

The colonizer has historically used this strategy, couched in the language of emancipation, to carry out its colonizing project. To the colonizer, labeling calls for anti-colonialism as racist, oppressive, terrorist, uncivil, and threats to security is intrinsic to the perpetuation of the oppressive colonizing practices.

This communicative inversion is tied to communicative erasure, the violence of erasing decolonizing articulations. Erasures are legitimized through inversions. Once anti-colonial speech is marked as racist, uncivil, oppressive, and terrorist, the colonizer can deploy the instruments of terror to pathologize and criminalize anti-colonial speech. Consider for instance the ways in which the language of anti-racism is deployed to silence the critics of Israeli settler colonialism. Across the globe, the instruments of settler colonialism networks through powerful structures to create the sites of erasure. Silencing the talk of anti-colonialism works to erase possibilities for decolonization.

It is in this backdrop that we must continue to raise our voices against Israeli settler colonialism. For any decolonization theorist, the call to decolonization must turn to the question of transforming the ongoing violence perpetuated by the colonial Israeli power in Palestine. 

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri