Skip to main content

The politics of/from/with/in/through the skin

CARE community researchers and organizers co-creating a food distribution system amidst COVID-19
CARE community researchers and organizers co-creating a food distribution system amidst COVID-19


The culture-centered approach (CCA) lives in, breathes from, struggles through the skin. 

We have to be willing to see and name our complicities with the structures, as well as struggle through in dismantling these structures if we care about transformation. 

Without this willingness to see one's complicity and the commitment to work to dismantle it, our critical articulations reproduce the colonizing logics of the structures.

Any theorizing of the CCA therefore has to work by grappling with what it is to work of/from/with/in/through the skin. 

To work of/from/with/in/through the skin is to have the politics of one's skin embedded within the struggle for structural transformation. To work of/from/with/in/through the skin is to commit to ameliorating the tragedies of life that are inflected daily on the margins. Without the "skin in the transformation," the theorizing work performs layers of erasures that propel an extractive system.

We can do this work of ameliorating daily tradegies in everyday solidarities. In the work of co-creating community gardens. In the work of co-creating food infrastructures where we witness hunger. 

In the work of agitating together against unjust policies. 

This work is an invitation to place our skin in the transformative labour of the everyday.

Even as the CCA negotiates its interventionist space by dialoguing with Marxist and Postcolonial theories, a large part of its discomfort with received and abstracted theories emerges from the distance from the skin that is actively cultivated through theoretical abstractions.

The CCA suggests that any work of theorizing in this sense must recognize that the work of abstraction, removed from the everydayness of struggles on the ground, is disempowering. 

Even when and especially so, when this theory work presents itself as radical or emancipatory without having placed itself in the struggle of building transformative registers, it reproduces the colonizing structures of extraction.

The work  of/from/with/in/through the skin is an invitation to place oneself amidst the everyday negotiations of deeply unequal structures, not by writing off these structures or by erasing one's privilege, but by actually investing in the practical ways in which this privilege can be dismantled.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri