Skip to main content

What does it mean to state "The critique of #Whiteness is structural."


In the theoretical work of the culture-centered approach (CCA), the critique of #Whiteness foregrounds and interrogates the hegemonic norms that privilege White culture structurally while undermining the imaginaries, lived experiences, and narrative capacities of colonized, enslaved, migrant, and refugee cultures. This critique attends carefully to the notion that the hegemonic cultural arrangements of #Whiteness circulate specific pathways of mobility for individuals born into a certain race (White and model minority Asian) while undermining the possibilities of such pathways for individuals born into other races (Indigenous, Blacks, Hispanics in the U.S. for instance). 

This analysis of the movement from the critique of the structure to the exploration of individual pathways is embedded in the interrogations of the interplays between race, class, gender, and nationality in the production of marginalization. 

A culture-centered reading foregrounds the ways in which structures of #Whiteness produce sites of marginalization in communities of colour as well as in White communities. For instance, large cross-sections of White working class U.S. have been structurally and symbolically marginalized because of almost four decades of relentless pursuit of neoliberal reforms. In the work of the "Voices of hunger" project in Indiana between 2008 and 2012, our research team collaborated closely with White working class advisory group members who had been expelled out of their livelihoods by the relentless pursuit of deep neoliberalism. In my conversations with many White working class community members, expelled by the grotesque financial crisis, the sense of dispossession was reflected in an overarching feeling of "not having a say in politics." This was also tied to actual struggles with living and livelihood, paying rent, getting food, and having access to basic utilities (fuel, gas, heat).

In culture-centered theorizing, the disenfranchisement of White working class America through systematic neoliberal attacks on spaces of grassroots democracy forms the backdrop of the rise of neo-fascism in the U.S. In other words, #Whiteness both produces certain sets of privileges while at the same time producing spaces of disenfranchisement and marginalization. Understanding this interplay is critical to the work of co-creating dialogic infrastructures for radical democracy. 

The work of dismantling #Whiteness therefore has to move beyond shallow identity-based theorizing to exploring through everyday labour the possibilities for co-creating voice infrastructures at the disenfranchised margins. Unfortunately, much of the critique of #Whiteness when performed by well established scholars from postcolonies (me included) in secure jobs with privilege and protection, fail to reflexively interrogate the privileges of class tied to neoliberal mobility. That I have moved into the structures of U.S. capital and benefitted personally from its neoliberal multiculturalism by positioning myself as the profitable "other"  has to be the starting point for imagining a different kind of politics of solidarity, one that works through everyday labour of connecting and caring to seek to co-create infrastructures of voice at the margins, including at the White margins of settler colonial societies pursuing #Whiteness as a neoliberal mode of governance. I have no patience for the Chanel-wearing, whisky-sipping, Calcutta Club-going fat cat Bengali academic in New York that climbs their way through #Whiteness by cozying up to #White structures, while castigating the "red neck" and denigrating the rural, the working class, and the struggling precarious classes.  This typology of the postcolonial academic in the U.S. (as the heart of Empire) embodies and profits from peak #Whiteness by performing it in everyday life.

The CCA invites us to critically interrogate any critique of #Whiteness that reduces itself to shallow identity politics or some performance of Oppression Olympics (none of us postcolonial academics in tenured positions are oppressed, so let's get off that bandwagon). It rejects the seductions of postcolonial opportunism and performance of the grievance games (What with the six-figure salaried postcolonial Full Professor with a Chair position crying hoarse about being oppressed).

Instead, it calls for us to recognize and study closely the ways in which #Whiteness perpetuates the consolidation of power in the hands of political and economic elites globally. This recognition forms the basis of the labour of co-creating voice infrastructures at the margins. The recognition that the very spaces of dignity and right to make claims to dignity for a large cross-section of the working classes (indigenous, migrant, coloured and White) across the global margins is orchestrated by the relenless pursuit of neoliberalism ought to be our registers for actively building and imagining just societies that dismantle the pernicious effects of #Whiteness.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri