Skip to main content

The color of memories

Even in death, the politics of race shapes what we remember, who we remember, and how we remember.

A Black US President feels for the children of Newton. He imagines them as his children, and is lost for meaning at the loss of the White children in rich suburbia of Newton. His solidarity for these children is expressed in the pain that he visibly feels and the responsibility he takes for collective action. The President’s sense of solidarity connects his experiences as a father with the fathers of the children of Sandy Hook. His tears offer a moment of authenticity through which we connect with him and with the pain of being a parent who has lost a child. Like him, as a father, I feel pain.

I also feel pain for the children in Gary, Indiana, a place a few miles South of Chicago where Black children die from gun violence. I have heard stories of suffering and hope that community members in Gary share. In Gary, the politics of race is written into the everyday organizing of schools, the opportunities that are absent, the parks that are missing, and the food that remains inaccessible. The stories I have heard in my conversations in Gary speak to the tremendous courage and resilience of community members who work every day to find meaningful avenues for engagement and to build hopes for health. Like the senselessness of the violence in Newton, the violence in Gary is senseless. There is no meaningful interpretive frame through which one can understand the loss of lives.

The dignity of the innocent lives lost in Gary connects in solidarity with the dignity of the innocent lives lost in Newton. The color of loss is different, and so is the economics of loss. A large number of deaths take place as a result of gun violence in poorer parts of urban neighborhoods. These stories of gun violence get written off as stories of crime, criminalizing communities, spaces, and races. In these instances, the victims of gun violence are denied the dignity of having a meaningful story that occupies our imaginations. We don’t hear the stories of poor children of color who are killed by gun violence. We don’t witness large scale global media narratives that are organized around celebrating these lost lives. We don’t feel pain through these stories of loss and don’t connect every day to mobilize for action.

This makes me wonder then, why is it that there are only certain deaths that we are willing to remember? Why is it that we as global collective communities only tell the stories of the dignity and innocence of some lives and not others? Even more so, I remain lost for meaning in understanding what is it that connects an African American President with the stories of loss of White children in upper socioeconomic status neighborhoods, and not with Black children in poor neighborhoods. Why is it that the President sees his daughters in the loss of lives in Sandy Hook and not in loss of lives of African American children in Gary or Chicago.

Through this global storying of violence, I also hope for listening to stories of children of color and children of the poor. Through these stories, I hope we can connect with an African American President who represents the hope for civil rights and social justice. Through these stories, I hope that we  can talk about the politics of race that reproduces disproportionate risks for children of color. The storying of the dignity of children of color is essential to political mobilization around the disproportionate burdens of risk faced by children of color. Are there any storytellers out there?

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Tova O’Brien and pedagogy of whiteness

So Tova O’Brien was looking for a click-bait opportunity to draw in listeners to her podcast and she found the migrant activist and Green Party politician Dr. Sapna Samant to pick on. In a gotcha moment, Tova shared with the Green Party co-leader James Shaw a series of posts made by Dr. Samant on whiteness, Hindutva, and multiculturalism, asking him if the tweets were OK. We don’t understand from listening to O’Brien’s podcast if her research team actively researched Dr. Sapna Samant’s social media posts, or whether these selective screen captures of Dr. Samant’s tweets were sent to her by someone wanting to target Samant. The thoroughly unresearched piece is poor journalism, reflective of the mediocrity that is perpetuated by whiteness , the hegemonic values of the dominant white culture in settler colonies. If indeed her research team had discovered the tweets, it’s worth interrogating why the social media posts of a migrant woman activist on whiteness are of interest to O’Brien’s po