Skip to main content

The necessity for public structures of education and the simultaneous regulation of the educational sector

I was reading today a facebook post from a friend about how there are several engineering, medical, and management institutes that are mushrooming all around India that charge exorbitant sums of money to afford admissions to large numbers of prospective candidates who are willing to pay the money for an engineering, medicine, or MBA degree.

The large scale and fast-paced growth of educational outfits all over the country is accompanied by the weak regulations of the education market, marked by rampant corruption and a climate of false advertisements. 100 percent placements, foreign collaborations, teachers from abroad- these have all become markers of educational outfits across India that promise the allure of success to anyone that enters through the door. Children, and more importantly, their parents are willing to shell out the money, sometimes going in debt, at other times even selling their valuable little savings in order to secure a bright future for their child.

What is however cause for alarm is the extent to which the slogans, advertisements, and marketing campaigns of the educational outfits are built on lies. Such forms of lying as integral components of the marketing logic have become fairly standard in the commodification of education. Loopholes are figured out so that institutions can claim that they offer internships abroad. Placement data are made up so that institutions can show 100% placement. Clearly, strong regulations, monitoring of curricula, and more importantly, monitoring of advertising/marketing campaigns are much needed. However, given the corrupt influences of money on Indian politics and vice versa, it is difficult to envision an overhauling of the educational system with strict parameters and processes of accountability.

Most importantly, in ensuring the accessibility of the poorer sectors of India (which is the majority of the country) to quality education, it is vital to foster public structures of education that create creative opportunities for students to participate productively in co-creating alternative rationalities.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri