Skip to main content

Pain Treatment from Multiple Specialists' Points of View

What is pain? I personally asked myself this question time and again as I read the articles (specifically the Raheim, Crawford and Mowat articles). Of course, it is subjective. On a day when I have an excruciating headache, how does that compare to an individual who suffers from migraines? If we were both to rank our intensity of pain on a scale from 1-10, would an 8 mean the same thing for both of us? Seems relative to me.

Last summer I began intensely looking for answers, and hopefully subsequent relief, for chronic neck and back pain. A sports doctor, a pain management specialist, a deep-tissue massage therapist, a chiropractor/acupuncturist… Each of them asked me to fill out a packet (some a couple pages, other nearly 15). I became very familiar with the multi-view body illustration within the forms, on which I was asked to shade the areas of the body where I was feeling pain. I’m pretty sure each diagram (while a few key areas were always shaded) looked differently, depending on the day (which concerned me because I would think, "What if I'm not shading the center of all my problems?"). I was becoming desperate for relief, especially once feedback from the plethora of doctors/specialists started to have common themes… chronic pain and fibromyalgia.

So, sure, I was having more and more difficulty getting out of bed in the morning, I was regularly feeling exhausted, and my self-designated responsibilities at home with my family were becoming more and more stagnant. But, I refused to give into a diagnosis of fibromyalgia (apparently internal LOC). The reason was because, personally, that seemed like an easy way out. When it is not officially designated as a disease and there is no underlying cause or explanation for its occurrence, then, no, such an informal diagnosis was not acceptable to me. Like Ester in the Raheim article, I have days, or moments within the course of a day, where the pain and discomfort leaves me altogether. So, I begin deducing the situation to one that is more psychologically based. My way of dealing with stress or anxiety is taken out on my body physically through muscle spasms and overall tension. Allow that type of circumstance to last over a long period of time, and it becomes chronic.

The doctor or chiropractor would often ask me on a scale of 1 – 10, what was my pain that day. Well, depending on how I felt I was handling the pain that number would dramatically fluctuate. A rating of four one day, where I felt positive and had a good outlook, would sharply contrast to a rating of 7 or 8, where I felt hopeless, frustrated and exhausted. However, the actual pain level may, in fact, be relatively similar.

The point of me pouring over my ridiculous state of affairs is because, from a biomedical model approach, I am beginning to see that my interactions with the complex network of medical services in our community still leaves me feeling like my collective state goes unnoticed. Every professional understands their specialty, and so I am “treated” based on how to know to deal with me. Each visit with someone else starts at square one. Crawford’s examination of MPQ, and how it actually tries to provide some form of consistency across the medical professionals for the sake of the patient, offered a slight glimmer of hope. However, it’s hard to believe, for the sake of finding the best and holistic treatment among an un-unified team of medical professionals, that providing a cohesive and understood set of terms is going to lead to a more unified and, most importantly, personal approach to healing.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri