Skip to main content

Culture and Sexuality

  This week's readings and the BLOG were a bit challenging for me in the sense, I had not thought of sexuality in this sense and understanding sexuality and relating it to the readings took me some time. Of course, culture and sexuality are related and intertwined. Culture is a meaning making enterprise and so is sexuality, the way we identify ourselves in relation to sex, gender. As a human being, your sexuality is a part of your physical, emotional, intellectual, and social self. It very much influences how we think of ourselves, how we relate to others and our meaning making process in the society. As all of us are different, there is no normative "sexuality but it is a product of the interaction of our gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, identity creation, values and persepectives (again leading towards epistemologies and the cosmology we access in the meaning making enterprise). This manifests in our expectations of how we think a man or woman should behave and these play a role in our sexuality. For example, My concept of a woman in India and in US are radically different, due to my beliefs, values, cultural dispositions and lived experience (again a result of my perceptions). The readings take these concepts to several new levels and dimensions.


Foucalt talks about power and its machinations to imprison, standardize sexuality. Amongst many examples, he talks of the architecture of the secondary schools. It was an 'aha' moment for me when I was reminded of the architecture of my school, its seating plan and the architecture of my hostel where there was a visible, tangible segregation both physical and self enforceed discipline of the living areas of the men and the women. While Foucalt is subject to intense criticism in many of his articulations, nevertheless his contention makes sense. 

The othering, the discipling becomes evident in many of the readings. In the direct and indirect sex work in Vietnam, I was taken back by the  capture-recapture method. The researchers approach the field with lots of paternalistic assumptions about the population and ignores the globalisation influences, the dynamics, the politics of sexuality. The authors are also naive when the profess that they are confident that they are able to map the hidden sex workers...a statement like this underlines lack of rigor, validity. Why use capture-recapture methods? The statement likening it to wild animals is probably the best reason!! Indeed, hidden sex workers are "wild animals". The methods leave lot to be desired and the interviews are more of surveys than really probing the issue. But methodology aside, it ignores the issues of sexuality, of expression, of relatedness, meaning making.

       The reading on crack cocaine made me very sad. I wondered how the black female crack users did really negotiate their life..family does play a larger role in it I guess!! And why is it always women who are at the receiving end. A question of sexuality? Then I researched a bit on the crack cocaine and Heroine phenomenon and was surprised that these were marketed and sold as legitimate drugs in the US by renowned companies. And how does it manifest in human lives...through the interstices of culture and sexuality and its overlaps and the way the dominant forces constitute them.

      The discourse on AIDS in the pieces are similar. AIDS means dehumanizing, stigmatizing and its the women, the "sexually deviant" who are on the receiving end...being blamed for the infection source, Racialized discourses, pathologizing discourses are rampant.  Schoepf, in describing these writes AIDS as an epidemic of signification. He quotes Reid (1992) who said that the international policmakers lacked epistemic responsibility in their neglect of gender inequality and their actions rooted in the hegemonic definitions and disciplining procedures of sexuality. As Schoepf further writes, the capture of the state by conservative forces seeking to conrol sex and pleasure. In a parallel vein Mehta writes eloquently about the distinctions and discourses situated in meanings of sexuality reifying the differences between the Musalmani (Katua) and Hindus. I remember me in college classifying whole communities as "Kuts" (diminiutive of Katua) without a reflexive thought. 

      I am looking forward to today's class to provide me more understanding and perspectives.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri