Skip to main content

Parents as Proxy Playmates and More

I grew up in a family of five that included my parents. I would say that it is an average family size in Bangladesh. Growing up, I was close to my parents, especially to my mother, although the idea of calling my mother my best friend (or even friend for that matter) never occurred to me. I was quite terrified of my father, as he would frequently ask me to memorize chapters from my text books all the time. For example, before going out to work in the morning, he would ask me to memorize chapters one through three in my physics, chemistry, and biology books. "When I come back form work in the afternoon, I will test you on your memorizations" he would say. So every second of the passing clock made me more worried as that would bring me closer to seeing my father again.

But still, I felt close to both my parents - I loved them and respected them and I knew they will be there for me when I needed them. And still, they were not my friends in the way we use the word 'friend' in Bangladesh. Just like Airhihenbuwa (2007) wrote, the "idea of throwing a ball around with my father would have been as strange to me as it would have been to him" (p. 85). Even though my family was not a big one compared to many of my relatives or friends, my parents never had to be proxy playmates. This scenario was overwhelmingly the norm in Bangladesh.

Interestingly, I had a female friend growing up who considered her parents her best friends even then. She said she loves to watch Baywatch with her father, which was a sign of mental instability for the rest of us to even think of that. Her expectation was that her behavior was 'normal' at that point of time, and that our reality was different.

Attempts has been made over the years to make instances like watching Baywatch as a family (not such a good example, but for continuity's sake I am using it) in Bangladesh a common practice. Parents now have become more proxy playmates to their kids, not only because children now can rarely go out and find a field to play, but also because such "parental friendship" has become a more modern thing to practice. Just as in family practices, campaigns has been launched to modernize medical practices in Bangladesh as well. Many of these campaigns created vertical programs - programs that stand alone only to promote donor agency agendas. But as Unschuld (1992) puts forward, a proper interrogation of such practices may reveal that the local and the Western practices may not be as different as are theorized to be - perhaps there are common rounds to both ways of looking at things (as exemplified by Chinese and Western medical practices) hat may be more accommodating of locale needs.

There are many in my family still who believe that all that was good was during the Pakistan time, or better, during the British era (see Cultural Imperialism by Edward Said) and our independence has weakened us socially, culturally, and medically. I am not sure if much can be done to influece that chain of thought for those people, but with schooling less influenced by the Western ideologies of education, further marginalization of Bangladeshi culture can be stopped.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri