Skip to main content

"Gapa", "Galpo", narratives...

The different narratives of a situation by the different people involved in it reminded me of a movie very close to my heart, Rashomon. As Connelly (2002) succintly puts it, the decision to retell a story will depend on the personal reasons/ motivations of the reteller. In today's world of health communication we have so many competing narratives. The search for the "real" or "right" narrative is not important but what's important is not to ignore these stories. Narratives provide us invaluable insights into a human beings life, suffering, existence, surrounding, health. In many ways it provides us a ground to move ahead, take decisions. 
In emergency response, in the first 48 hours, usually teams do not find much records or information as most records are affected and the normal information channels are in a disarray and non functional. So, the way the response team moves ahead is by collecting narratives: "so please tell us how did the flood waters come in and what were you doing then? How did you reach safety? Did you have any medicines with you?..and so on".  This narrative gives us a picture of the village/ community, some initial numbers to work on and a story to share with the larger community/ the world outside. 
Narratives help us situate ourselves, in our identity creation. As Adelson (2001) writes, they help the indigenous peope continuously negotiate their identities within the nation state. Hawkins (2002) puts forth beautifully in his fictional story and further connections with the greek play on Philocletes, the famous archer. The narratives display the ethical dilemma, the torn between choices situation for the young doctor. I assume this would be the situation in which many medical residents find themselves in the beginning of their career and lesser so as across time they make peace with the contestations and lose their reflexivity and "ethics (?)". 
Stories do matter and have a great effect. All the times, I have been to villages to interact with the community and implement some project, I will be asked to listen to a lot of problems/ stories and entertain requests of helping them. Of course, I would be careful not to give false promises and raise expectations but I will give them reassurances and promises of looking in to the matter by speaking with the responsible government functionaries. But in my heart of hearts, I know that my sheer presence there is raising expectations and they have sacrificed their valuable time to meet me for some benefit which I am not sure that I will be fulfilling.  Each day of working in the field is a ethical dilemma with no "right" or "wrong" answers. I realise that these interaction with the narratives and stories has guided me. In today's health scenario, there is no time for stories, specially in the timed world here in the US. "Time is money" and there is so much to do that one is always running behind...behind what..Time of course!!! So, is it only the anthropologist and the writer who has the time for narratives or some communication researcher who has been "funded" to work on narratives? Further, narratives are not sterile but a part of the context where the narrative is created. Taking it out of the context ensures its sterility but strips it of the meaning which is relevant to the community.
Perera (2001) scored a good point after all his pages of stories from a fractured community of Sri Lanka where every narrative is so contested that the only solace is in the present. Perera (2001) with his narratives shows that where the state, the rebels, the powerful, all prosecute, where the state, biomedicine, science, rational approaches cannot provide succor, its through narratives that the community finds healing. Its through their own constructed beliefs, stories that the mother is comforted of her son's death, the wife of her husbands' torture and of making sense of a life where everyone more powerful prosecutes/ exploits you without a reason. The narratives help the people make sense, articulate.
As communication researchers, we ought to spend more time on exploring narratives and research money as they give us access to hitherto unexplored spaces which can lead to coping and healing.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri