Skip to main content

Your Subject Pools, Your Theories

When I came to graduate school in the mid 90s and started learning about many of the health communication theories by reading the empirical literature, I was taken aback by the number of studies that were published out of samples in US classrooms. These were theories tested by scholars embedded in Eurocentric hegemony and were tried out through tests on subjects who were embedded within the same hegemonic configurations.

In contrast, the number of concepts and theories that were advanced by scholars from elsewhere or were developed through methodologies that were open to engaging with alternative publics were simply absent. The lopsidedness of the voices that made the knowledge claims and that served as the building blocks for making these claims in the backdrop of those that were absent was initially jarring. I must say that I continue to be jarred by this lopsideness even after having survived the academia for over a decade and for perhaps having risked being co-opted through the process.

The ommission of other ways of knowing from other geographic, ideological and epistemic spaces leaves deeper impressions on us than we might imagine. What are the implications of such ommissions? As these theories continue to be presented to us as universal theories that ought to explain, interpret, predict human behaviors, we come to take them from granted as the blueprints for understanding human communication processes, patterns and messages. In spite of the glaringly Eurocentric roots of such theories, they are forwarded and presented (and continue to be presented as such) to us as universal theories for understanding "human behavior." The obviousness of this logic leap however escapes most of my US colleagues (even the most "liberal" kinds who typically proclaim that they are all for diversity and multiplicity).

Such perhaps is the deep-rootedness of Eurocentric hegemony that most often we take-for-granted the obviousness of the problematic of logic leaps when we move from culture-bound constructs to making generalizations about universals. In spite of our sophisticated training and perhaps because of them, we become paralyzed in our ability to think critically about the potential consequences of such logic leaps. Perhaps we become so blinded in our hegemonic configurations because these very configurations also maintain and sustain our privilege. Questioning the parochaility of our subject pools and the limited scope of our theoretical insights would perhaps undermine the privilege that equips us with our expertise so we can make pronoucements as health communication experts?

The thoughts posted here build on my scholarly review of health communication campaigns in the article titled "Theory and Practice in Health Communication Campaigns: A Critical Interrogation" published in the journal Health Communication. I am currently working on a follow-up piece that empirically documents the presence and absence of multiple voices in major communication journals.

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Tova O’Brien and pedagogy of whiteness

So Tova O’Brien was looking for a click-bait opportunity to draw in listeners to her podcast and she found the migrant activist and Green Party politician Dr. Sapna Samant to pick on. In a gotcha moment, Tova shared with the Green Party co-leader James Shaw a series of posts made by Dr. Samant on whiteness, Hindutva, and multiculturalism, asking him if the tweets were OK. We don’t understand from listening to O’Brien’s podcast if her research team actively researched Dr. Sapna Samant’s social media posts, or whether these selective screen captures of Dr. Samant’s tweets were sent to her by someone wanting to target Samant. The thoroughly unresearched piece is poor journalism, reflective of the mediocrity that is perpetuated by whiteness , the hegemonic values of the dominant white culture in settler colonies. If indeed her research team had discovered the tweets, it’s worth interrogating why the social media posts of a migrant woman activist on whiteness are of interest to O’Brien’s po