Skip to main content

COVID-2020 Elections: Now is your chance to invert the republic of "communicative inversions"




If there is one thing that COVID-19 has made abundantly visible is the deeply unequal social compact we inhabit. 

This inequality is founded on "communicative inversions," the turning on their head of material reality to convince us that the forms of governments that give massive tax breaks to the wealthy, attack our unions, and deplete state support for those among us that are struggling with getting by are necessary to remove poverty and to create opportunity.

You see this language of "opportunity" used by the political elite across the globe. 

The elite tell us that giving rich corporations tax breaks and creating policies that allow elites to make even more wealth for themselves is somehow the only way to generate employment opportunities for the rest of us.

This story of "creating opportunity" through tax breaks and state subsidies for the already rich is the fundamental "communicative inversion." Of course, as a communicative inversion, it is never borne out by evidence. 

Instead, the evidence clearly points out that these policy clusters, giving tax breaks to the rich, creating government subsidies for the elite to profit, attacking unions, and depleting state welfare for those in need (also referred to as neoliberal policies) are actually, as common sense would tell you, really harmful to those at the margins of our societies. Those that are struggling are portrayed as lazy, unwilling to work, likely to lie, paradoxically through deceptive stories cultivated by a political class that thrives on carefully crafting and selling these lies. 

Moreover, these neoliberal policy clusters are also really harmful for those of us in the middle classes. While we might be led to believe that in the short term, these enriching schemes for the rich might create opportunities for us, in the long run, we witness it with our daily struggles that the opportunities created primarily benefit the elite class. And no, even the crumbs don't trickle down to those at the margins of our societies. As the global financial crisis in 2008 made amply evident, the middle classes find themselves without protections, a few months away from cycles of poverty.

We are living today in the midst of the deleterious effects of these "communicative inversions." 

In 2020, COVID-19 makes very evident the deeply unequal societies we are living in. The effects of these policies are felt in the struggles with livelihood among those at the margins of our societies. These effects are felt by our poor and by our migrant workers. These effects bring us face-to-face with the deeply immoral societies we inhabit. 

#COVID-19 also makes visible for those of us in the middle classes the very little protections we have, that we might be a lock-down away from losing our livelihoods, our homes, our protections.

Amidst these visible and disturbing inequalities that have been carefully tucked away by the republic of "communicative inversions," the elite political class is busy concocting new "communicative inversions." They hope that these "communicative inversions" will draw our attention away from this material reality of deep inequalities and economic disenfranchisement. 

The elite political class is busy concocting diversions such as projecting anti-national threats, attacking opposition politicians as anti-national, and carefully projecting external causes to draw our attention away from their complicity in the production and circulation of policies that have led to the inequalities we witness all around us and struggle with.

2020 is the year for you, for us to pay close attention to these "communicative inversions" and the work they do in misleading us. 

2020 is the year we have an opportunity to turn these "communicative inversions" on their heads. 

2020 is the year we take back our democracies. 2020 is the year we take back our social compact, committing to electing only those politicians that demonstrate (remember demonstrate, not rhetoric) a clear track record of addressing the deeply unequal societies we are living in. 

Inequality in 2020 must not be an after-thought. It must be the front and center of conversations on electoral politics.


Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri