Skip to main content

What does listening mean in CCA methodology?

I will share today an example of listening from our CCA grant on heart health funded by AHRQ. On this grant, we have a very strong community partner that has tremendous community presence. We also have a strong media partner that has done a fantastic job with the production of the content. Our team collectively has a lot of expertise at developing and running large campaigns and doing community-based work. In spite of all this expertise, one part of our community-driven work in one of the Counties hit a major roadblock because the media partner did not end up inviting the local leadership (state representatives, legislators, Black caucus, mayor's office) to our press launch in spite of being told consistently by the community organizer as well as by the Purdue team that this was very important. It turns out that one of the key leaders, a state representative, a champion of health inequities and health disparities work from the County called up our community partner and expressed his discontent that he was not invited to the event. There were also questions raised about the sustainability of the project and the commitment of the academic team to carrying out the work over the long haul. The community organizer, along with the media partner and the academic team brainstormed over strategies and decided upon holding a town hall meeting with the community and with local leadership. I offered to call up the state representative) this is someone I have interacted with before and hold a great deal of respect for) and converse with him. I do believe that we have  a fair chance of engaging this opportunity dialogically both as a learning moment and also as a positive resource for community engagement. However, when considering our method of determining the press event and the launch, we failed to listen to the voice of the community organizer. I remember how the night before the event, seeing that there were no media stories already and that the media were mostly not aware, our community organizer had suggested that we cancel the event. At that point, our media partner had assured us that it would all be taken care of and press releases are usually sent out the morning of the event (because that's how the media environment operates). I trusted the media partner and their professional competence, without really attending to the voices from the community that suggested otherwise. Yes, listening to the voices from the community is always a challenge,  more so because our professional expectations of expertise always trump our so called calls for listening. We have now assured the community partner that we are going to work on making it right, that we are going to set up series of steps to be more observant. These are all great response strategies. I have also discussed extensively with the media partner the importance of listening to the community partner. Nevertheless, this is also a learning moment for me as a CCA researcher; a learning moment that points to my own limitations. A moment that also points to the importance of constant vigilance, especially when difficult decisions will need to be made. 

Popular posts from this blog

Zionist hate mongering, the race/terror trope, and the Free Speech Union: Part 1

March 15, 2019. It was a day of terror. Unleashed by a white supremacist far-right terrorist. Driven by hate for brown people. Driven by Islamophobic hate. Earlier in the day, I had come across a hate-based hit piece targeting me, alongside other academics, the University of Auckland academic Professor Nicholas Rowe , Professor Richard Jackson at Otago University, Professor Kevin P Clements at Otago University, Dr. Rose Martin from University of Auckland and Dr. Nigel Parsons at Massey University.  Titled, "More extremists in New Zealand Universities," the article threw in the labels "terror sympathisers" and "extremist views." Written by one David Cumin and hosted on the website of the Israel Institute of New Zealand, the article sought to create outrage that academics critical of Israeli settler colonialism and apartheid are actually employed by universities in New Zealand. Figure 1: The web post written by David Cumin on the site of Israel Institute

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems wit

Disinformation, Zionist propaganda, and free speech: Far right cancel culture

Thursday October 12, 2023. The settler colonial occupation had unleashed its infrastructure of violence over the Palestinian people over a period of five days. Gaza was being indiscriminately bombarded, with mass civilian casualties that Amnesty International noted " must be investigated as war crimes ." At 3:32 p.m., my office phone rang. I was occupied and the call went to the voicemail. "Dutta, you are a murderous, f***ing, racist c***. Go back to where you belong...I will see to your termination in New Zealand." A couple of hours before that, an email had gone out from the Zionist Dane Giraud to the email listserv of the Free Speech Union, performed as a supposed apology for attacking my academic freedom. In the email, Giraud referred to my earlier b log post on the interlinkages between far-right Zionism, attacks on academic freedom, and the free speech union, noting how he had been enraged by the following statement on my blog: "I was therefore not surpri