Skip to main content

Decolonizing the Frame: How the Culture-Centered Approach Exposes the Structural Link Between Zionism and White Supremacy

From the New York Times

The global political landscape often presents conflicts as isolated events rooted in ancient hatreds. The Culture-Centered Approach (CCA) insists we look deeper—at the structure of power, the systems that marginalize culture, and the mechanisms that silence voice. It situates these forms of cultural erasure in the context of the erasure of voice and the project of expelling colonized peoples from land and livelihood.

Applying this lens reveals that the ideologies of Zionism and White Supremacy are not merely analogous forms of ethno-nationalism, but deeply intertwined colonial projects rooted in the same Western imperial structure that sought to dominate both land and people.

The Core Structure: Settler Colonialism

The CCA argues that communication and culture are shaped by underlying structures—the political, economic, and institutional arrangements that allocate power. Both Zionism and White Supremacy function as archetypal settler-colonial structures.

  • White Supremacy (Classical): The colonial structure established by European powers (e.g., in North America, South Africa, Australia) required the assertion of the colonizer's racial superiority ("whiteness") to justify the dispossession, enslavement, and cultural genocide of Indigenous peoples and enslaved Africans. The structure demanded that the land be "cleared" and the settler class be privileged.

  • Zionism (Settler-Colonial): The political project of establishing an ethno-state in Palestine, predominantly driven by European nationalism, relies on a parallel structural logic: the necessity of replacing an indigenous population (Palestinians) with a preferred settler community to ensure demographic and political dominance.

The core structural link is the demand for exclusive sovereignty over stolen land, achieved through the systematic erasure of the indigenous population’s culture and presence. In both cases, the settler group—regardless of their internal ethnic diversity—is structurally positioned as the "civilized" master of the territory, while the indigenous population is racialized, delegitimized, and denied agency.

The Cultural Erasure Mandate

The CCA centers on how marginalized cultures are suppressed by dominant power structures. For both White Supremacy and Zionism, the act of colonization must be preceded and maintained by cultural warfare.

Silencing Indigenous Voice and History

  • Denial of Voice: The CCA highlights the crucial role of communication systems in maintaining hegemony. Both ideologies rely on narratives that present the settler as the native and the native as the aggressor or anomaly.

    • In the context of White Supremacy, centuries of historical erasure framed the continent as a barren frontier, effectively silencing the pre-colonial histories of Indigenous nations.

    • In the context of Zionism, the narrative often employs the concept of "a land without a people for a people without a land," which fundamentally denies the existence, history, and culture of the Palestinian people, thereby justifying occupation as "settlement" or "return."

  • Racializing the Threat: The continuous process of land theft and structural violence is justified by racializing the colonized "other." The systems need to communicate that the Black or Indigenous person (or Palestinian) is a perpetual threat to the "civilized" settler state, making surveillance, policing, and military action appear necessary for "security." This is where the selection's critique of AI surveillance and disproportionate targeting becomes acutely relevant: modern surveillance technologies are the structural communication tools of the colonial state.

The Intertwining of Identity and Privilege

The structural linkage becomes explicit when examining how White Supremacist groups often express support for the state of Israel. This is not a contradiction; it is a recognition of shared structural goals:

  1. Shared Logic of Exclusion: White Supremacists see the establishment and maintenance of an ethnically exclusive state, achieved through military dominance and border control, as a desirable model for their own racial goals. They admire the successful implementation of a settler-colonial project that prioritizes one ethnic group over all others.

  2. Racial Hierarchy: Historically, White Supremacist thought has often positioned European Jewry in a complicated, often contradictory, relationship with "whiteness." However, in the context of the Middle East, the settler-colonial structure itself often confers structural "whiteness" onto the dominant group relative to the racialized Palestinian "other," aligning with the global hierarchy of Western-backed power.

As the CCA teaches, structure determines privilege. In a world defined by Western colonialism, the state whose power structure is based on successful, armed ethnic exclusivity finds alignment with other ideologies seeking similar racial and territorial purity.

The Call for Decolonial Solidarity

The CCA demands that we move beyond surface-level political analysis and center the voice and agency of the colonized.

To truly address the violence of both White Supremacy and Zionism, the required response must be one of decolonial solidarity. This means recognizing:

  • That the struggle for Palestinian liberation is structurally identical to the struggles of Indigenous peoples, Black communities, and colonized peoples globally.

  • That challenging the core colonial structure—the right of any one group to establish exclusive sovereignty over stolen land through violence—is the only path to genuine peace and cultural flourishing for all.

The CCA offers the necessary tool for this diagnosis: by revealing how power structures silence culture, we can empower the collective voice needed for global decolonization.

References

Dutta, M. J. (2023). Theorizing southern strategies of anti-racism: Culturally centering social change. In The Routledge handbook of ethnicity and race in communication (pp. 301-314). Routledge.

Dutta, M. J. (2024). Resisting an unfolding genocide: reflections from radical struggles in the Global South. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 110(2), 294-304.


Popular posts from this blog

The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe

  The Haka, the Hurt, and the Work We Owe An Indian in Aotearoa reflects on resistance, complicity, and the solidarities we have yet to build Mohan Jyoti Dutta I watched the haka. I watched it several times, in fact. Each time, I tried to sit with what I was feeling before reaching for what I was supposed to think. Let me be honest about who I am in this conversation, because that matters. I am an upper caste, upwardly mobile Indian man. I am a professor at a university in Aotearoa. I carry the accumulated privileges of Brahminical socialisation, of English-medium education, of institutional access that was never designed for the communities I now write about and alongside. I say this not as confession but as orientation — because where you stand shapes what you see, and I have learned, through years of working with communities at the margins, that the refusal to name your own location is itself a colonial habit. The haka directed at Parmjeet Parmar did not offend me. It ...
Read more

Whiteness, NCA, and Distinguished Scholars

In a post made in response to the changes to how my discipline operates made by the Executive Committee of the largest organization of the discipline, the National Communication Association (NCA), one of the editors of a disciplinary journal Rhetoric and Public Affairs (RPA), Professor Martin J. Medhurst, a Distinguished Scholar of the discipline, calls out what he sees as the threat of identity (see below for his full piece published in the journal that he has edited for 20+ years, with 2019 SJR score of 0.27). In what he notes is a threat to the "scholarly merit" of the discipline, Professor Medhurst sets up a caricature of what he calls "identity." In his rhetorical construction of the struggles the NCA has faced over the years to find Distinguished Scholars of colour, he shares with us the facts. So let's look at the facts presented by this rhetor. It turns out, as a member of the Distinguished Scholar community of the NCA, Mr. Medhurst has problems with w...
Read more

The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor

  The Substack and the Slur: How a Manufactured Crisis Toppled a Wahine Māori Political Editor On the architecture of the Aotearoa culture-war machine, and the danger it poses to a democracy heading into 2026 There is a particular cadence to the afternoon on which the career of a senior Māori journalist  at TVNZ is finished. It is unhurried. It begins with a tweet — in this case, a single image of a typed statement, posted by Maiki Sherman, the now-former political editor of TVNZ, on the afternoon of Friday, 8 May 2026, announcing that she had parted ways with the broadcaster. The post was terse, dignified, and final. As RNZ later reported , Sherman wrote that the scrutiny of the previous week had placed enormous pressure on her and rendered her role "untenable." The first wahine Māori to lead a major broadcaster's political team was gone. The story that finished her had not, ten days earlier, existed in any newspaper, on any wire, on any website you would consider mai...
Read more